Search results

Driving similarly doesn't apply surely. I mean I could stop driving tomorrow if I wanted, but I can't see how yesterday's winner can request retirement. I'm fine with horse racing, but it doesn't really have an equivalent in much humans do as we have free will that animals don't.

I'm not fussed about horses, but dead footballers seems an odd comparison to bring up. We didn't kill Dave Busst after all.

Regular penalty taker takes precedence over individual stats generally.

I usually end up losing but after considering the winner while picking. This year I didn't even see the winner's name come up, so I didn't even hypothetically come close. I did spot on PaddyPower that you can bet on Wrestlemania too, which I thought was a joke but then bookies were taking bets...

Your 'usual suspects' paranoia is getting the better of you.

I just lost a fiver, I hope they kill all the horses.

Who won the sweepstake?

These horses die so Findus may thrive. Who wants to eat jockey? It's all stringy and tough.

I can't see the league position of the host having much bearing on the suitability of the stadium.

We really shouldn't have got Nathan Cameron back for this one.

We were debt-free, in the sense that your uncle pays off your credit card so you're not really in debt but you still need to pay him back. And he's the weird uncle who gets a bit handsy at family parties after a few.

Based on the fantastic arguments in this thread, the JR thread is going to be 1000 pages long with about 10 of any use.

After that Specials article the other month, that's all the mentions we get now for at least four years.

It's been going on for quite a long time, but it tends to apply mainly to high-profile stuff like internationals and probably Champions league and the like (might even just be a Nike and Adidas thing, but not sure). Down in the deep end of the Football League though the shirt you can get in a...

If only that were true...

You'd think Lucy's had enough of courtroom drama what with Ken only just getting cleared.

Double congratulations to those whose principles don't include haranguing others with shit emotional blackmail.

This is a weird argument. It clearly says 'if we keep these players it's a good base' which is somehow countered with 'if they go it isn't, so you're wrong'.

It's a relief that we've ground out some points while playing shitty recently, especially with a few clean sheets. I'd take that over glorious failure at the moment.