Search results

When you've seen him have you approached him and made him feel uncomfortable or are you just expecting others to do it?

It might be obvious to some but there are many people who will assume that's the norm and be up in arms.

That's what the Lib Dems wanted but we got a referendum on alternative vote instead. Problem was apart from the Lib Dems there was little campaigning, that whole thing was a bit of a waste of time. Proportional representation is the way to go for me. Every vote counts.

We seem to be a lot more organised than last season. And seem to be getting in the right type of players. Lets hope there's more on the way.

Yet the number of people in part time work because they can't get a full time job has not returned to pre-recession levels, nor the number of people in temporary jobs because they can't find a permanent job. Not to mention the number of people in work who need benefits is at an all time high.

We all know exactly what he'd say. The offers are nowhere near the level required and they need to see proof of funds and know who they're dealing with.

Don't forget Staley and Wood. Cornell is the most shocking, totally out of the blue.

That went downhill rapidly!

Don't forget, we're all in this together.

Doesn't seem to be the uproar about the Chancellor getting his figures wrong by many billions on the Today show this morning that there was when Abbott made a much smaller mistake.

That'll be the group who kept insisting they weren't encouraging a boycott then. :banghead:

The Conservatives said they'd eliminate the deficit by 2015.

And guess what would have happened then, you'd have been the one locked up. The most shocking part was when that nurse went in with a huge folder of evidence and police, social services etc all basically shrugged their shoulders and said nothing to do with them.

Wouldn't the contact be with the old company that SISU liquidated?

Then he's way out. There's no way if you total up what SISU would get if they sold every player they could get a fee for and sold Ryton it would be a total of £2m.

Why is it nonsense? If its being claimed Labour are dangerous for borrowing then its a perfectly valid question to ask why it is acceptable for the Conservatives to borrow far more than Labour are proposing and still be considered the safe option.

Source: The Conservatives have been the biggest borrowers over the last 70 years

But no problem with the Conservatives borrowing double that amount while making deep cuts to public services and telling us 'we're all in this together'?

That's the key. If Hoff is saying CCFC, or the bits he wants to buy, is worth £20m she'll want the £20m now.

Agree with this. The fact that Labour policies are being presented as some sort of communist extreme left thinking is bizarre when you look at how many of those policies are in place elsewhere in countries we wouldn't consider left wing at all let alone on the extreme side.