Search results

Bloody hell now you are scrapping the barrell. Comparing AT to that. Choosing 2 out of top 3 most hated! Nice tactic though.

No I am happy with stats published 21st June 2012 far more relevant. :D

Someone seems to suggest 700 people voted but I have not seen that yet. If it is true, that is a good dip sample of Cov fans to me.

Why dont you email the CET and find out how many did instead of suggesting no one has. You may find it is 500-1000 people , you may find it is insignificant like you make out ie 50 people or less. If they supported your view would you still be so critical of the survey?

Only new contracts this summer onwards count towards the ffp. Our contracts from last year don't count.

Did he mention FFP only counts for new players we sign, nit existing contracts. That is our one edge.

I wish, .......

Its just so frustrating to think about it. Back then Westwood, Dann, Fox and Gunnar in one team To be fair to the fans who took the survey, at that point we had only sold Dann and that was for 3.5 million. I imagine they though that this money would be used on new signings Here is more of a...

When we took on AB, I realised they had really lost it and were trying to go down the cheap route and I knew it was always doomed. I just couldn't comprehend that their plan really was throw 6-7 million at players in one go and expect to get up in that season. Then if we dont, plan B was...

I think by the looks of it Cov may have still had Fox when the survey was taken. When did you realise that SISU were skint then. Literally after they sold Dann. Or were you dubious abbout them from the moment they came in? Personally I was not happy when SISU came in as we did not know who...

I actually meant a case against him based on the results of the survey, which you seem to be doing. The survey, that suggests the majority of fans who took this survey do not agree with you.

SO at that point Jul 21 2009 Am I correct when the survey was taken the club had sold Scott Dann. The club still had Westwood, Gunnar and Danny Fox. What was your view in July 2009 exactly 3 years ago, at that time that meant you were in the minority?

Sorry duffy I see the link, does not actually give you all the results that are published in the paper. It is all quite a majority in favour of AT in any of the questions asked about him. If you had the paper in front of you with the full results, you would really be struggling to try and...

Call me cynical, however based on Coventry city's board past financial decisions. Do you think we had the business sense to include relegation clauses :thinking about:

Thanks. So the best we can hope for to stay under the 4 million is lose between 3-6 players And gain 5-8 respectively.

Bloody hell that is some digging 3 years ago. The days when we still had Westwood and gunner.

This is AT we are talking about and not micky Adams or AB. :)

You were given an option to say it was a bit of everything and 39% said that. Whereas 51% chose to solely blame the owners. Basically 51 % thought if the owners had not sold the best players or actually replaced them sufficiently AT would have kept us up.

Never ever ever thought I would hear myself say this. However here goes........... I dont think it will happen due to wages, but if Emile came to us on league one wages I think it would be good signing. He would be good in the big man role then we would still need another cody and another...

That's what I really want to know does the 4 million include them or is that now with what we have left. The shame is I really dont trust TF with figures at the moment. He uses them a bit like the politicians do. Did someone have his email address?