Search results

No, they'll say they believed it was implied because they took Fisher at his word given the language he was using, renders etc (not that he intentionally lied as circumstances can change) on the new stadium and they therefore took it that the football club would be secure by the end of the...

But quite often the assistant is not directly in line either and so his opinion is compromised by his position, plus he only gets to see it once in real time. You could always put a GoPro on them to provide an alternative side-on camera angle?

We already see a lot of defenders put their arms behind their back to try and block shots. What if the attacker tries it and misses the hand/arm? There's a decent probability they'll lose possession and look stupid. One thing I would say is that because instances of handball would become more...

Quite probably, but you can guarantee that they'll argue it was implied because by the end of that agreement the chairman of the club had said they would have their own new stadium by then, and so they didn't feel it needed to be an expressed term. Complete horseshit but it's how they'll spin...

I don't agree there's NOTHING we can do about (like we can do with councillors by voting them out - even though it doesn't seem to happen anywhere near enough). We can fight for the legal framework to be changed so that people in private enterprise are more harshly punished for doing so...

I think for me it should be written into law that MP's can only get a pay increase that matches the lowest given to other public sector workers (and certainly front line workers like fire, ambulance, nurses, police officers etc. I find it amazing that in an small island nation with a lot of...

Of course everyone wants the best people to be in control of government and they should be well paid for it, but upping the wage isn't really going to matter. For most it's an ego trip and about the prestige. If people are going to be convinced by the money, then they're clearly not in it for...

No, sadly I don't expect them to. They're politicians so they'll spin information whatever way they choose and cherry pick the bits they want and leave out the bits they don't. It's a sad indictment of the world.

I agree. Everyone should be setting an example, but they're not. I know the rules aren't the same, but I think they should be. If you have positions of power and responsibility that will impact on society you should be held just as accountable. Trouble is if someone against SISU tries to go...

I agree - it could be that he's now considered first team rather than development but in that situation I think I'd want to add a bit more time on than one year. Of course he and his agent may not want to add longer. From what we've seen of him so far he still seems to have some way to go to be...

TRANSFER: Sam McCallum Joins Sky Blues Says three year deal in that.

If you truly believe that's acceptable then it's no wonder the worlds shit and being milked by greedy twats

But the way you worded it gives the impression you and others think Fisher shouldn't be held AS accountable as the council because he's private sector. ChiefDave pretty much says as such. I do not believe that should be the case - each should be as accountable as the other for their actions...

I was just going to suggest could anyone imagine the PL reaction if someone came in and said they were going to do an NFL style franchise system to rebuild the league and give the league committee more power. But it's not a system I want to see. It effectively turns clubs into cash cows for...

TF is a bullshitting twat in a position of authority and power who has an obligation and responsibility not to lie and mislead. He is a custodian and representative of the club and therefore should be held accountable as such. Councillors are bullshitting twats in a position of authority and...

Isn't this just a year longer than the one he was on previously? Great to get long term deals for players, but seems a bit weird for one extra year with 2 years left on the current one. Maybe there was some contract clause we wanted to get rid of?

It would get some coverage definitely. I'd have three though - one outside the council house, one outside the Ricoh and one outside SISU offices.

From a legal perspective there is nothing that can be used against the council(lors) in those statements and the documents are filled with caveats and proviso's. If you want to use those councillor quotes as enforceable evidence, then those made by TF about the stadium also have to be...

As I've said I want to see that 4 year thing questioned and torn apart. I just can't believe they even used it in the first place as it wasn't necessary, but now they have it needs severe questioning as all it does it make you suspicious.

This is only guessing, but I guess they mentioned them to appease the football/rugby fans in a poorly worded attempted to reassure them that the clubs mattered to the city and the council. If they hadn't mentioned them there'd have been people saying "why aren't they talking about the...