Search results

Thought you would like the RR bit :)

Very hard but with a bit of stability no sacking managers and off circus' no transfer embargo's meaning summer targets don't sign. The new owner no doubt would want to sign a couple to make a statement. Personally I think that should only happen with the loss of others from the wage bill...

I have heard they are considering it. However they need to wait until admin is confirmed. They have approached RR and he has said yes but would like to bring AT as assistant manager and head scout

Rangers, shit owners football league nailed them. The fans were the ones who really suffered. It's a shame the punishments hit the clubs and not the owners.

Also it seems he will only bid if the club is administration so he will then have to deal with the landlord, tHiggs and the Council. So why waste his and SISU's time?

The point is once each sides legal argument is set they won't publish those answers.

Just open minded enough to know you can't judge a manager over three games. He may have been good or bad this season Tim said no more sacking managers. Took responsibility for the relegation of last season as most on here agree. Then sacked Thorn after three games we then lost 5 on...

What was SISU's reply?

Top point!

Start of this season sack your managed led to 5 defeats in the bounce. So a 10-15 point deduction was introduced by SISU. If we have a new owner and this same squad with the same manager for the aeon we could get in the play offs even with a 15 point deduction

If your answers are the truth and you are defending you position and the answers actually support your position in court. You would do what ACL did.

I think unfortunately it has to be forced at a cost if 15 points Unless they approach the yank and say give us this amount and we won't contest it.

Have you seen the latest questions and answers session SUSU have now learned if you can only lie then block your answers

I completely missed it somehow. One side open and transparent other side I will do an interview give you answers then not allow you to publish them. Yet some still side with SISU in all if this incredible

He denied any deal has been done just for the Higgs share. He envisages that any deal will be for both. That can't happen unless SISU are either selling or forced to sell. When that happens you have due diligence and only the can you say a deal is lined up. He was saying because of...

Unbelievable, have those who defend SISU's position in all this seen that link!

Or administration and a new went that can shake hands on deals the back it up. Fingers crossed

They are saying it was to prevent the club going into liquidation as threatened by the owners. (One of many shocking business practices)

Yes unfortunately now I know more about Hedge funds than I would ever care to know.

Fair comment Stu