Search results

Don’t think that makes much of a difference to the question being asked of him. BTW is the Andy Fletcher that attends board meetings any relation of his do we know? I’ve always assumed not but worth asking the question.

Surely you’re not suggesting no pressure has been put on SISU?

See the usual crew, such as armybike, are desperately defending the council on twitter. Not many of them left now though.

You really couldn’t make it up. What a joke.

The club have tweeted since posting this statement that SISU will be releasing a statement of their own and this is from the club not the owners.

Strong stuff maybe but nothing in there that isn’t correct. This is the type of thing we should have been seeing from the trust weeks ago instead of cosy meetings patting each other on the back.

Half the value of the lease doesn’t come close to providing enough security for the amount they owe on the bonds. Even if you take the valuation from their last accounts which struck me as very high.

How can Wasps use the lease as security for the bond issue if 50% is owned by someone else.

That makes no sense. Kicked us out doesn’t stop the legals so the risk to Wasps doesn’t decrease. In fact you could claim he was failed to act in the best interests of the business by turning a significant client away.

The lack of follow up questions is so frustrating. I’m not a trained journalist but I can think of several questions off the top of my head: What valuation would be the basis for negotiations; Would the buyer take on 50% of the bond liability; Why now, are Wasps in financial difficulties; Has...

Some of the things he was tweeting at the time he was pushed out hinted it wasn’t entirely unrelated to questioning the council.

That’s correct. Another condition was to be given access to the same information that had already been supplied to Wasps to verify the business was as healthy as was being claimed. I would suggest that’s not an unreasonable request. Shame the media never press him on these conditions and just...

Would expect nothing more from TalkSport. They're not bothered with anything outside the Prem and aren't going to know the ins and outs of our situation. CWR on the other hand should be able to challenge on the relevant points but seem happy to give an easy ride.

Hopefully, unlike PWKH, they will be challenged on their answers and lack of consistency.

Because its been made up by Fisher to suit his statements at the time of no option but the Ricoh.

There seemed to be a lot of people assuming they wouldn't file accounts and therefore the club would have an embargo and that a groundshare would be a no go with the EFL. Accounts filed and signs a groundshare is already being discussed. Maybe their constant claims they don't need the club are...

Does this indicate a slight softening of Wasps stance? They've refused to meet the club, refused Coventry Cathedrals mediation offer but have said yes to this.

Joy for a new handbag.

Not even scheduled yet is it?