Search results

The complaint to the EC was about a third party not Wasps. It didn't fall within the requirements Wasps had put in place which the club met prior to Wasps changing the terms. Presumably if there was a requirement for everyone to be upfront about things involving third parties Wasps informed the...

Don’t think we got a lot of it back. Seem to recall the council citing a time limit on claiming a refund and only paying back the last two or three years.

The redaction is odd. For example Fishers name is redacted but Sepallas isn’t.

It’s just so obvious now. Nobody can possibly be so stupid they can’t see that the football club, or OEG if you want to call it that, and SISU are separate entities. Same people will be arguing CCC had nothing to do with the PR, that was all ACL.

Rob Dorsett (@RobDorsettSky) | Twitter - chap who did the interview Dan Donovan (@danieldonovan) | Twitter - producer

It's pretty well hidden on the council site but you can get to it here: Agenda item - Hearing into Complaint under Code of Conduct - Coventry City Council Appendix 5B is the one with the emails.

If you look at the emails in the council ethics report they take about going after Sepalla and SISU, even talking about doorstepping her. Webber Shandwick copy in council email addresses, why would they do that if the council had no involvement?

This is where the council don't do themselves any favours. We've all seen the emails about a media war and doorstepping but they make out there's nothing to it. They would look far better if they addressed what actually happened rather than giving it 'nothing to see here' and hoping nobody checks.

I don't see any issue with speaking to the likes of the Telegraph and CWR. If nothing else it could encourage people who could make use of the tickets to get in contact. If you don't want to do it maybe someone else can go on and speak?

Maybe they should speak to each other before firing out statement as Hoffman has now said he was talking with Wasps about a long term deal at the Ricoh! Suspect Wasps are playing with semantics. I don't think anyone believes Wasps as a company or Richardson as an individual are going to put...

Still refusing to confirm or deny if Wasps are involved but has admitted he has had talks with them in the CT, although they've done their best to bury it in the article.

By ‘dealt with’ do they mean emails were produced which showed they were doing exactly what Seppala has claimed?

There's a couple of clips here: Coventry City (Sky Sports) They might add more later. The reporter tweeted that as there's been so much interest they might try and post the whole interview online.

Les Reid Exclusive INterview with Seppalla....

Nothing earth shattering even in the extended clip, hopefully Sky make the whole interview available. Does seem to have prompted Gilbert into action on some of the issues we've wanted digging in to for a while, hopefully he continues down that road and doesn't just accept whatever waffle the...

Hoffman and Elliott both refusing to deny any Wasps involvement speaks volumes. It should be something anyone involved in a takeover bid for the club should be able to laugh off as a ridiculous suggestion.

And that's exactly why it needs the Telegraph and CWR to ask the right questions and not be fobbed off by Wasps.

If they have no involvement in any potential takeover shouldn't be an issue for them to confirm they haven't met with Hoffman or anyone else who wishes to takeover.

How would SISU bring further action against Wasps?

If anyone wonders why there's a distrust of the council this tweet sums it up. The former leader of the council suggesting that if the council are found to be in the wrong which would mean the taxpayer had lost out of tens of millions it would be wrong to expect the party who benefitted to pay.