Search results

Still refusing to confirm or deny if Wasps are involved but has admitted he has had talks with them in the CT, although they've done their best to bury it in the article.

By ‘dealt with’ do they mean emails were produced which showed they were doing exactly what Seppala has claimed?

There's a couple of clips here: Coventry City (Sky Sports) They might add more later. The reporter tweeted that as there's been so much interest they might try and post the whole interview online.

Les Reid Exclusive INterview with Seppalla....

Nothing earth shattering even in the extended clip, hopefully Sky make the whole interview available. Does seem to have prompted Gilbert into action on some of the issues we've wanted digging in to for a while, hopefully he continues down that road and doesn't just accept whatever waffle the...

Hoffman and Elliott both refusing to deny any Wasps involvement speaks volumes. It should be something anyone involved in a takeover bid for the club should be able to laugh off as a ridiculous suggestion.

And that's exactly why it needs the Telegraph and CWR to ask the right questions and not be fobbed off by Wasps.

If they have no involvement in any potential takeover shouldn't be an issue for them to confirm they haven't met with Hoffman or anyone else who wishes to takeover.

How would SISU bring further action against Wasps?

If anyone wonders why there's a distrust of the council this tweet sums it up. The former leader of the council suggesting that if the council are found to be in the wrong which would mean the taxpayer had lost out of tens of millions it would be wrong to expect the party who benefitted to pay.

This point needs to be pressed with the council and Wasps.

If any fan actually sat down and thought about what this means and the potential impact on the football club I can't believe there would be anyone who thinks SISU aren't right in refusing to sign us up to such a deal.

The responses Gilbert is getting from Hoffman and Wasps indicate Sepalla is correct in what she says. They are choosing very specific language and not actually denying what is being put to them.

To be fair they said they weren't a properly development company but then later said it was a property development company with a rugby club attached!

Its staggering how CWR and the Telegraph have not pushed this. Its been know for a while now and they've sat by doing nothing. The council and Wasps should have been getting absolutely hammered for trying to put unreasonable terms in place and asked what they are so worried about if they are...

It would be easy to dismiss but for the fact there's council documents in the public domain that talk about doorstepping. You then have CWR and the Telegraph portraying her as some sort of reclusive bond-esque villain and it doesn't look good when you hear things like this.

What sensible businessmen turns away 300K customers a year and their associated spend. Not to mention rent from the football club and the additional value to naming rights. Even if their business was thriving they'd be mad to do that.

Gilbert acting like this is some massive revelation being made by Sepalla today when the likes of the CT and CWR have completely failed to look into it when prompted numerous times. Hoffman refusing to deny it is as good as a confirmation for me. Anyone who had any intention of ever being...

This is the key point for me. If there's nothing to it and a guaranteed victory for the council just let SISU keep wasting their time in the background while dealing day to day with the football club. A relationship both sides have said is good until it reaches the level of Sepalla and Eastwood.