Search results

The price tag is definitely the problem. As you say, if he'd been bought for a lot less as a squad player/ impact sub, the conversation would be very different. Personally, I'm realistic about the price. It's a huge sum for CCFC of course, but in Premier League squads there are loads of duds who...

Agreed, and we have to hope he'll make people eat their words. I believe he can.

But people are going way too far with stuff along the lines that he's not good enough to be a pro footballer.

There is no way that the vibes on social media don't get through to them, whether they read stuff directly or not.

Has Wright looked like a £7m player so far? No. Does he deserve the grossly over-the-top criticism throughout this thread? Again no. The guy clearly has ability, and if you haven’t seen any merit at all in his highlights footage or his performances for us you are blinkered. If his effort at...

But you are disrespecting them. Kelly's performance as a holding midfielder tonight was seriously good IMO. The team shape isn't working, the balance isn't right, but that shouldn't detract from the way he did his specific job.

I've got a dribbler in the middle.

Too many ridiculous rankings and omissions to go through them all, but Hedman at 23rd vs Glazier at 56th is an interesting take 😂

True, but he is clearly in much better physical condition than when he put in so many sluggish performances last season, and he's sticking the ball in the net. There's no urgency or justification to give Simms preference over him at the moment - he's young, on a long contract, and his...

I don't disagree that he looked a good player, but earlier in his career he was destined to be a top international. I still don't think he was ever in that bracket for us, and you could almost see his frustration with the physical limitations he was having to overcome. So yes IMO he was an...

The whole exercise is prompted by safety concerns, as per the original post on this thread. There's also the question of giving people the choice to stand. So it has never been purely (or even mainly) about revenue.

It says his brother is a boxer who weighs 672 kilograms, so best not upset him. That's 105 stone.

They are a chicken SAG.

Did you mean the North Stand?

Fair enough. My recollection was that for us he always looked a shadow of his former self, and you could tell his movement was restricted. It's a measure of his talent that he was still good enough to play well in the top flight though.

Just checked this, and yes 'rail seats' allow each space to be used for either seating or standing as required (locked into one position or the other according to the event). So safe standing needn't reduce seating capacity at all.

Really?

I thought each safe standing space also included a seat which can be brought into use whenever required?

Surely the club would be more worried that if someone got badly hurt after safety advice had been ignored, they could be taken to court for enormous sums, no matter how tenuous the circumstances. The key to solving this is to make changes which take away the SAG's concerns. I assume that's the...

No shame involved :) It would be enough to pay the wages a of a very good player, assuming those 3000 seats were filled all season which is of course highly unlikely. Anyway, revenue isn't my main concern - it's more the messy nature of the current arrangements in a part of the ground which...