Search results

Idiot.

Yes, I thought this was a withdrawal agreement.. and now comes trade. Over to Herr Selmayr‘s Team for the workings of any agreement ... you know the one we love to insult and want to have sacked.

Er no... that you were wrong to accuse me of lying when I had asked you a question..

The only nautical reference I found from you was the good ship EU going down. It obviously hasn’t, so that prediction has been put off for now.

I just checked and can’t find one where you used the term glorious sunset. Which is why I asked if you were the one. You do, however, think that it will be all plain sailing ( as far as I understand it ). It isn’t. And after two years we still have not agreed what we want. Which is a fact...

Yes, he is allergic to facts. He is convinced that if he blocks people who point out facts, his bullshit will then become true.

I asked you a question. I didn’t make a statement. I thought you were, but I asked in case I had got it wrong. That is not lying.

Yes, sums it up brilliantly. The Brexit sheep will revert to Selmayr and far off imagined trade deals to get round the facts.

Weren’t you the one on about sailing into a glorious sunset? Two years later and we haven’t decided how to leave the harbour. The crew are getting unruly and we are worried about getting supplies.

I don’t have to prove anything. Just wait a few months and see what happens.

Yes, I am because of his connection to the Heritage Foundation which sets Trump‘s agenda.

If you want the UK to do well , why don’t you read up on the TPP to see whether it is a viable alternative to the EU? Just wetting yourself about a newspaper headline doesn’t mean you are backing something to the UKs benefit. I am doubtful about it. I am really dreading Fox coming back with a...

The opposite of bigging up being part of a trading bloc with Viet Nam...

I have said that joining a trading bloc after leaving one because of the terms of a trading bloc, contradicts the whole leave argument. We will be subject to the rules of TPP and decisions of a court thousands of miles away. Madness. Carney was talking about one aspect of the EU‘s...

Haha.. is TPP a worse choice than making a deal keeping us in the SM and CU?

That was the answer from the EC. It says they applied the regulations. Point 7 by-passes the open job offer. Which, although an absolute joke, is the reason why no one has been able to reverse it. Selmayr got the job, and Juncker put him forward, so obviously they had something to do with it...

Good. What are they? And when were they implemented? All reports I read said they were allegedly offered. Have you a link to clear that up?

He was talking about financial matters, I mentioned border controls where the EU countries are already investing.

From what I seen, they were getting 3 years transition payments in the past anyway. I read something about them keeping the cars, drivers and security. Maybe that is what is meant as extras?

What is the truth? „10. Is it true that Commissioners agreed to Mr Selmayr's appointment as Secretary-General only because they had been promised additional "sweeteners", like increased pension allowances or financial benefits after the term of office? This is not true. The Commission neither...