Search results

Scrooged is my Christmas tradition usually, must be at least 10 years on the trot and counting now

I saw It's a Wonderful Life through for the first time over Christmas. The bit when George runs home delightedly shouting to everyone, you'd cross the road to avoid that kind of manic lunatic.

I'm all for people being able to carry on with normal life after their debt is paid, but I'm not sure how enthusiastic I could get about someone who was jailed for intimidating a witness in a murder trial. The most criminality I can overlook is along the lines of Glen Johnson nicking a toilet seat.

Girls love a bad boy, attendances will SKYROCKET

They let him out since so he should be available to play.

Assuming it actually was a distraction for the players, the ref mustn't have noticed it which isn't unrealistic considering there are people in the stands who didn't realise it had happened.

He spoke to both captains about it, he couldn't have not mentioned it. Can't see any action being taken though unless it becomes a constant.

YES

It does, just other team's pitches.

The o-line is sadly as flaky as it's ever been, but Earl Thomas being out in particular makes the defence seem more vulnerable. Lockett's a big loss too. I'm still expecting to beat Detroit, but I can't see much joy in Atlanta.

People do want the club to be profitable, but as far as priorities go it pales in comparison to footballing success by any means (I can only imagine how many times 'speculate to accumulate' has been used here over the years) which is understandable as people would rather see good news on a...

When the position is that your opinion is the one shared by 'fair minded observers' whereas the other is shared by 'some elements' you're not really respecting it yourself. It's the wording of the statement that can only detract from the point, in much the same way that some guy with a whistle...

Anyone who can't see an issue with the wording of that statement shouldn't be trusted with putting out statements.

They'd have been better off saying nothing at all instead, that's incredibly snide.

That's the way I'm still leaning, but they could be asking why they've let the ball get away from them in a dangerous position in injury time. My immediate thought when it happened was first that play had stopped, and then that the players had hesitated thanks to the whistle. I still think...

One confirmed so far

Without sound it looks like a regular mixup. It's impossible to say either way as observers.

That still isn't really conclusive in fairness, it shows the ball was near him but it was still zipping along thanks to the Bolton player shanking it. You could quite easily pass it off as two players assuming the other will cover as much as you could that they stopped due to a whistle.

I hear we've been stockpiling pies in a secret bunker

I don't think anything can be conclusively proven either way, only the players themselves can know. There definitely was a whistle blown, but that's about as factual as it can ever get.