Search results

The team might not be Pressley's fault, but it is his responsibility. If he feels he can't put together a competitive team with the resources he has then he needs to stand aside and let someone else have a go.

League Record last 4 years (since 15/01/2011): P 184 W54 D53 L77 Pts 215 PPG 1.16 Win% 29.3 Pathetic considering over half of that time was spent in league 1.

I cant help but think your flattering them slightly in suggesting they actually have a plan.

We tried that before and it never really caught on, did it?

But that in turn also makes it less likely for Sisu to sell the club on and make a return on their investment.

I think how it is for a lot of people is they still care about the club, but find it hard to care about individual results anymore. As much as I want the club to progress, I struggle to feel anything after a result, win or draw. My caring of Ccfc is now about its long term survival rather...

I find it difficult to believe that any alternative owners could be worse to the most incompetent people in the FL.

Surely we all want Sisu out? No one likes or supports them apparently.

And that will help our club how?

Why are the self proclaimed "I only care about the football club" lot so upset about something that had no effect on the football club?

So are you. I'm just making assumptions from the opposite side.

I'm just talking about the law mate. I don't know what Les Reid lost his job for, but if he disobeyed his superiors instructions then that would be a sackable offence in most organisations.

That would be for the editor of the CET to come out and say. If, as alleged, the editor of the CET was happy to not print a certain story then how can that be blackmail or bribery?

No and No.

The editor of CET is perfectly entitled prevent him from reporting it, he was his boss. Bosses tell their employees not to do things all the time. This is exactly the type of thing I'm on about. The mind game tactics that some journalists use. Half the forum is now up in arms thinking that CCC...

No because its a family member. All I will say is a certain Telegraph reporter suggested someone in my family had done something wrong which had not a shred of truth to it. When you know someone you care about is completely innocent yet their name is being turned to mud because a jumped up...

I cant stand the man. I have seen first hand ways in which its been suggested innocent people have done something wrong with a sensationalist headline (which the article then bares no resemblance to the headline).

So in this instance, who hasn't allowed it?

Not really, they didn't have freedom of the press in the USSR.

What? So press freedom means a newspaper has to print everything? To me freedom means you have the choice to do something or not do something. If that is strange to you then I don't really know what to say.