Search results

Corrected that for you.

What has race or class got to do with it? If someone is an idiot they are an idiot.

The best thing for "the team" is investment, to play in a stadium in the city they represent, and to be safe in the knowledge that the club they play for is a stable place to advance their careers. Most likely way to get all those things is with new owners.

Your splitting hairs there I think. If there are "worst fans" then that must mean some are the "best fans". That equates to having good fans and bad fans.

WTF have Wasps got to do with it? As for the game, I am sure we all want a win, are you suggesting otherwise? However, if a 5-0 defeat somehow got us even slightly closer to getting rid of this disease then I would take it in an instant.

I'll post this again in case you missed it (unlikely seen as you replied to it).

He, and everyone else should be praying to God that enough fans still give enough of a shit to protest. If as a group of fans we cant even be arsed to protest against the worst owners in the league, then we as a club are dead.

So those there wont be supporting the team?

Well you didn't seem too quick to disagree earlier:

Can't win here it seems. Stay away from games and you get called a bad fan. Go to games and protest and you get called a bad fan. What exactly do people want?

If someone is a danger to society then they should be locked up. If they aren't they should be free to get on with their lives. That's my opinion. Someone is either a freeman or they are not. That has been the principal of justice for 800 years.

Is that the pub that now operates as the Old Clarence?

Not sure I would be too happy about a nice green space such as Hearsall Common being built over. It is common land for a reason. Not that a new stadium is going to happen, but if it does, then it should be on a brownfield site.

This thread reminds me of when Kevin Kyle scored a goal and then come out and said "I think I've now silenced my critics".

They did

Your wrong. An foi can be refused, but not falsified.

If you say so. Who exactly are you to determine what other fans' motives are?

To spin that on its head, perhaps you don't care about the club enough to give up your Saturday afternoon out?

I would be interested to know why a "stadium owned by a third party" will prevent the club from progressing? How does the club (or more likely club owner) having its name on a title deed increase income?

Unless you want to be seen as anti democratic then you need to stop your vile disgusting accusations.