Search results

Yes with a very clear and specific outcome. Leaving with no deal is like STV winning and then a minority of people deciding they fancied changing the voting mechanism to raised hands and shouting. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tbf the government are not tied to follow directions delivered via referendum, not matter how much people would like them to be. That aside, his point is that the mandate from the referendum was for a deal and the mandate from the GE was for a deal. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Must have missed that but it does explain a lot. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No deal isn’t a credible threat. Even if you forget the fact it would be more damaging to us and hence about as sane as trying to win an argument by shitting your own pants it still makes no sense whatsoever because we’re not just trying to strike a deal with the EU. We’re trying to come up with...

But it isn’t. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Government taking a hounding in parliament for their made up statements. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’d say that’s quite inappropriate and clearly intentional. As if those are the first terms that would come to mind when trying to be descriptive. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The thing is they won’t reap what they sow. We will. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This can’t be right as everything is going to be sorted in the next two weeks isn’t it? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tell the Syrians that you can’t have an open border for goods? You’re making no sense whatsoever. I know you really, really want Brexit to work, and there are ways that it can, but there’s no point just denying reality and playing make believe. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It really isn’t. You cannot have a wide open border. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There aren’t. The government admit this. They aren’t keeping it a secret. You are being delusional to try and stop yourself accepting the issues related to Brexit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Only because the government promised the court they’d get an extension. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There’s nowhere near enough agreements in place. Not to even cover a fraction of what would be lost. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What point are you trying to make? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Any deviation undermines every other trade agreement in the world. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

As much as it may not feel like it I think the path to remain is still very difficult and unlikely. The path of least resistance has always felt like a compromise deal to me although I’m not sure what or how and the longer things go on the more difficult that seems. Sent from my iPhone...

I’d imagine in reality they’d be some shared use of resources and infrastructure but imagine what the negotiations for that would be like! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Really? WTO requires a border as well. Plus we’ll still need a trade deal of some kind with the E.U. You can’t just have an open border else you’re open to all sorts of illegal activity and you spread that to anyone else you have any kind of free movement of goods with. Sent from my iPhone...

The problem is people are so used to the single market they now can’t imagine an actual border. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk