Search results

I am not bothering with you on this anymore. 1. I said why do we NEED to own it. We do not. It helps. However we do not (and again I am putting emphasis on this) need to. 2. If what I said is a guess what is your answer? 3. What can I say? I think you have made yourself look silly on that...

This is the thing ...... An Ideal World. There is a lot of Ideal World's in this situation. However, we are where we are. Sisu/Otium need to realise that the situation is far from ideal, so they need to make it far more "ideal" for the fans by offering as much as possible. Offering shirts...

1. Why do we need to own it? 2. Relationships with CCC and SISU would have been a lot better, so probably easier to negotiate a deal to buy the Ricoh. 3. Because Revenue would be a lot higher if we were still at the Ricoh. Do some simple maths yourself and you will soon realise paying £400k a...

Agreeing to the original 400k rent a year deal at the Ricoh.

Is it not the case that they have released a specific number of shirts now, prior to them releasing more shirts at christmas? Are the next batch going to have the proper sponsor on or be sponsor-less as well? If the shirt had the charity on would it have stopped you buying one? Or would you buy...

There was definitely a viable and realistic alternative. But we are where we are. Both are at fault bla bla. It is in the past now.

I would rather have a charity on my shirt, than CBRE or any money-making business for that. Personal Opinion.

The Ricoh Arena ........ Paul Appleton. GOOD CALL!

But it is a charity ............ how can you not see my point??

That I can live with. Constant bullshit and narrow-minded selective view points I can't.

I am sure I heard somewhere that they had changed their mind and it was going to stay on the shirt for the rest of the season anyway ......... even if that is complete bull ...... I don't see your point.

point being?

Don't bother. He is a cnut

That is not my point. When the sponsor is a charity, surely to get the best "charity" for said charity you need to get people noticing it. Not putting it on the supporter's shirt is crap if you ask me.

I'm sure there will be something us pond life would have missed

Strippers are good for something though right?

If the league said they have to pay that, is that considered part of the liquidation process, or just seperate?

I think this wedge is bigger on the forum than in real life. Although when people like Les Reid blow a few choice words between the "scabs" and "muppets" out of proportion that doesn't help either.

Doesn't really surprise me that he has found nothing and earnt a wedge for it. I really am in the wrong profession.

I don't care about the past anymore. My biggest issue now with the owners is that they are not doing enough to get supporters on their side and get them to sixfields supporting the team.