Search results

Wasn't that on the blog?

Completely agree with this. Stopped following him on twitter that week because it was literally embarassing!

I don't remember that. What did he do wrong? Whether he did or didn't, the point still stands that he is supposed to be impartial, yet isn't.

On what basis did Michael need to shape up or resign? How does he have the right to state whether people need to resign or not?

It depends how you want to be? Be good and do missions etc. Be bad and be a complete terrorist! Anyway I will have a look for this tonight, if you get chance to add me it is lewys33

Are you saying you like men?

He launched a personal attack on Michael who runs the NOPM/KCIC campaign. Tell me that is neutral?

I haven't read the piece. My issue with him is over his twitter meltdown.

I don't think I could ever fully support another club. However I agree it would have to be when we are liquidated or when the move is deemed permanent. When that is I don't know, as I don't know how long we can wait to see any stadium plans ...........

Fed up of Les Reid now. He bores me ..........

That just proves you are not taking in what I say. My argument is based on what they should of done in the past, hence ignoring it (because it wouldn't have happened). My argument is not based on being in our current situation and just "forgetting the past". Because I am using what we DO know...

Your arguement above has absolutely no relevance. ACL and rent compared to a neighbour commiting war crimes? Jesus ...... I agree ACL tried to out-smart SISU. But so did SISU with ACL. Realistically has either side won?

how do I pick my battles? Why should we accept it isnt an ideal situation? I wish they wouldn't have bothered at all rather than do it half arsed. They are being paid sponsorship by CBRE and it was their choice to put the charity on the shirt for 3 months.

I agree with some things. However, I don't think they do need to own the management company. Again, yes of course it helps, and the more the club owns the more revenue it will create for us. With regards to the gates, the Ricoh was built for a premiership team. Obviously that fell on its arse...

This did make me laugh a little. Bless them. What did make us laugh more though was the "more like this" stories at the bottom ....... http://metro.co.uk/2013/10/14/chipsteads-chubby-goalkeeper-anthony-hall-hits-back-at-bishop-stortford-fans-after-james-corden-taunts-during-fa-cup-tie-4145025/

Clearly you deserve an apology. I didn't realise you were superior. I am truly sorry. With regards to dyslexia which only applies to swear words - (was your mistake above a typo? Or an attempt to mock me?) I am used to writing on other forums where swear words are blocked out. So just to...

Gladly if that is the response.

If that is the case: 1. Why are they not promoting this? 2. I still think they should sell the shirts at £35 with £5 going to the charity. By selling the shirts at £35 and offering the extra printing for £5 which goes to charity it suggests they are not prepared to take a hit on their own...

Of course I would love CCFC to own the stadium. But there is also no proof CCFC will own the Ricoh if we buy it, or this new stadium. When Fisher was asked that question at the fans forum he quickly diverted elsewhere. So for arguments sake if we do not own it, how are we better off? I still...

please tell me how that is being pedantic? Well firstly, I am not arguing that if we own the stadium the revenue is greater. However the question I asked was WHY DO WE *NEED* TO OWN THE STADIUM? The answer is we don't. It helps. However we don't need to own it. If we got back to the Ricoh...