Search results

  1. O

    BPA Update

    TF: This is Jon Sharp’s project – it is his rugby club, his proposal to put to the council first and foremost. This venture does not involve SISU, We don’t want to create animosity with the City Council. It does need pointing out that this is a Coventry City FC venture, not a SISU venture...
  2. O

    BPA Update

    "Further cut the income " - so you agree WASPS are restricting the income? No offer to CCFC from WASPS has included any offer of additional income generation to the football club
  3. O

    BPA Update

    I think CRFC would be there ?
  4. O

    BPA Update

    There is no restriction - Reeves has said so
  5. O

    BPA Update

    It doesnt have rugby posts either I think
  6. O

    BPA Update

    You can draw up plans but you would not spend a lot of money on getting them through planning without the landowners consent.
  7. O

    BPA Update

    Are you saying that Millerchip has not seen any proposals? CRFC has just decided we have an idea and said "We will just stick up a shed Chris it will be OK" now transfer the property? Millerchip is a cute lawyer he would not have got to this stage without knowing what was planned. It because...
  8. O

    BPA Update

    They could hold a friendly at BPA - would not be more than 5000 there surely?
  9. O

    BPA Update

    Go away little man and do your fishing elsewhere! Try the Sowe next to AEHC You know perfectly well it is CRFC or Millerchip are the only people who can talk to CCC planners NOT SISU
  10. O

    BPA Update

    CRFC gates were down 8000 last season - that is a lot to them
  11. O

    BPA Update

    You tell Millerchip to stop playing Lord Chief Justice then and transfer the lease because until then nothing can happen - can it?
  12. O

    BPA Update

    So if this is the big squeeze to get CCFC out of Cov - would people go anywhere else if local? ( And take CRFC with them ? )
  13. O

    BPA Update

    Trips to Cannes?
  14. O

    BPA Update

    Read what I said - " if a properly prepared project was put to them"
  15. O

    BPA Update

    Property development to boost WASP's coffers on CCC land ?
  16. O

    BPA Update

    The biggest cure for the City of Coventry is for Reeves and Co to leave now and head for Birmingham! It is heading to be nothing but a Chinese dormitory for students
  17. O

    BPA Update

    What's more the attempted blocks were no more than lies so Reeves could go fishing
  18. O

    BPA Update

    Lawyer to CCC now? Wonder how long that has been going on?
  19. O

    BPA Update

    Was told the planners could see no problem if a properly prepared project was put to them
  20. O

    CET (again!)

    The "leaked" mail referred to covenants the Council wanted to change ( impose ) but could not. My original post referred to covenants at "AEHC" not planning
View older results
Top