The club paid very little for their 50% of the shares when ACL started, so it's happened before.
I'm not of course suggesting it would or should happen in this instance, just cheap point scoring, sorry about that.
The formula price would set a maximum price, they can always accept less, but I think the formula can't be used anyway as ACL are owed money from the old company.
Higgs were prepared to accept less than the formula before. We can forget about the formula price.
When Rob S met with Joy and she told him that SISU didn't want to interfere, he said that.....
Joy's basic argument against the Ricoh was that she thinks it's too much of a business risk at the price ACL want. "The revenue potential is too unclear." Key points were:
IEC/Compass contract(s)...
As I have mentioned PWKH has said that Higgs have to give permission for it to be transferred, it can't simply be traded according to him*.
*Pretty sure it was him, I'll have a listen again to his interview on CWR.
I would imagine they would be arguing they have already bought the beneficial ownership when Otium took over, so no need to resurrect CCFC Ltd, with it's debts.
The case is against the Council, not ACL. Although ACL are linked by virtue of having received the loan, I don't see that it distresses them particularly.
Higgs can turn down any offer if they want, the option just says they (CCFC Ltd*) have a chance to make an offer.
*There is talk of beneficial ownership transferring the option, I don't think this will work, but I'm out of my depth with that.
Pretty sure PWKH, or maybe it was OSB58, or both, said that Higgs have to give permission for the purchase option to be transferred. So claims of beneficial ownership won't work will they?