Search results

I would like to think Sisu would accept that though. Would give them a saleable asset.

Positive news, but let's not forget Labovitch's position in the club.

Gifted to the club yes. Sisu? No.

I have no issue with a company putting 40mill in to a business and expecting a return ...... That is IF they do an ounce of decent business to get that 40mill back. I don't think they deserve a return if they walk in to a failing business, and continue to fail themselves.

But that would be supporting the council ;)

All we need is Joey Barton to roll up and world peace will be resolved.

Sisu plant!

I'm fucking sick to death of them trying to make the badge cheaper!! I would rather pay an extra £5 and have all the colours we used to have!

There is a slim hope that if they lose, they decide to take an offer like this and sell up ............ slim hope.

When I met with ML, the one thing he said that stuck was "If CCFC are at sixfields next season they are finished." Where do people stand on this comment then?

Obviously we all want the club to pay less. But if you pay more, and get A LOT more custom from it, then it is the right decision to make is it not? It may even be crazy enough to make everyone look at sorting this out properly again ........

I guess it is up to SISU to make the next step. I dont expect them to accept this (obviously it isn't a "real" offer as Grendel liked to put it). If they say they are interested and make a counter-offer then its a step in the right direction.

That is because we are financially viable at sixfields - DON'T YOU GET IT?! ;)

It is a little confusing, obviously it would be a lot clearer if it was completely free!

The bit with the 5,000 may be the downfall, but we will see. Interesting to think about the potential merchandise increase, and sponsorship as well.

Instead of people saying this is rubbish, wouldn't it be better for the club to explore the option first?

The offer is basically "KCIC" pay rent unless the crowd is over 5000. Obviously there is no "real" offer yet because currently the full details haven't been discussed. I guess it is down to SISU to see if they want to explore this "real" offer you speak off.

So we should accept the groundshare as the only viable option currently?

Is that a fact?

I would suggest this is the easy part wouldn't you?