Search results

Sure if you complained about this on social media it'd get traction and the club would get a lot of unwanted publicity. You might say there'd be a massive pile on.

But you have to be careful. There tends to be an overreaction by both sides whenever change occurs. When we have a massive deregulation because of rules stifling business and growth. Then a few years later it all goes to shit because the things that we build as a result of that deregulation...

Yep, personality definitely beats policy for those people who aren't engaged with politics.

Feel free to bookmark it and we'll come back to it after a few years of a Reform govt.

Agree entirely. the big issue was not the mines closing down, it was that there was nothing done to provide new employment for those communities once they did. It was just "move somewhere where there is work". So many areas, especially in the north, that were just left to rot and become slums.

It's pretty much always been the same. Someone comes along with vague soundbites and they interpret it in the way they want to interpret it so they think that person is saying what they think they want to hear. Then they get shocked when it turns out that the reality is entirely different. They...

Or people just aren't paying attention. When they hear the message they want then it's all fine, when they see their poster boy getting his arse handed to him in an interview they just ignore it and say it's bias.

For many, many years he was massively overrepresented in debates and giving soundbites on the news. Arguably now he has got a larger amount of support he should have more airtime, as it's necessary to actually question him on policies rather than just letting him give soundbites. And the few...

So imagine what will happen when it gets supercharged.

Well I guess we'll have to wait and see won't we. Though from your response of trying to deflect immediately I guess you think that's the likely outcome (though you'll never admit it of course).

So you're agreeing that the BBC are impartial then.

Massive cuts in public spending as they cut taxes so the few services they do get get scaled back or even taken away. Stagnant or falling wages mixed in with rising prices as they back their buddies in big business. Increased use of private sector in providing public services increasing the cost...

IDK.

Like having the likes of farage on giving his opinion far more often than his political backing warranted? Oh no, then it was to 'provide a balanced view' wasn't it...

Why would we go to all that trouble (and potential expense if you want to pay up his contract) to bring in another CH? At that point does Woolfenden become our fourth choice CB and not getting a game, so we should go through the same procedure with him at that point? A fourth choice CB isn't...

I'm just telling you the facts of what I've found while working there. I don't speak to everyone in that community and of those that I do most we've never touched on the subject of politics. Frankly I don't bring it up as its a surefire way of creating tension. But of those that choose to talk...

Why? Shouldn't everyone have to have the integrity to not misrepresent the facts and not mislead the public? Or is it OK if someone's bankrolling you to just do what you like? If the BBC was funded by left leaning activists would it be have been OK for them to have gone even further in...

And why should they? When Trump tells lies and told to apologise, he just doesn't do it and attacks whoever it was telling him to apologise. Trump doesn't have even 1% of the integrity and impartiality of the BBC.

But if you did get rid of VAT on energy you can almost guarantee those companies will hike prices so bills don't actually come down. The fact they're making obscene amounts of profit already tells you they could make the cost of energy cheaper, they're choosing not to. They'd rather put that...