Search results

Yes it is. It’s about supporting certain rights. Most of support a right that allows murderers to walk free. It doesn’t mean we want murders to happen

Do you think murderers walking free is a price worth paying to have a legal system that has to prove your guilt?

I think we all have the right to be innocent till proven guilty. I’m sure you agree with that right? Because of that right, we know that rapists and even murderers will have walked free. Whilst we support the right of innocent till proven guilty, and accept that guilty people will walk free...

You think he WANTED people to die?

I imagine they had to register as a republican to get into the republican rally Trump was at

Again, please learn the difference between disagreement and cancellation.

I think that’s a dangerous relevance to accept as given that offence is taken not given, all of us can potentially offend others

You mean sometimes he failed in his aims? You know what that made him? Human

Well decent people are appalled by it A minority of scumbags of twitter are celebrating

That’s interesting considering they don’t know who shot him yet

I said some people found it polarising

Who decides what is and isn’t polarising? You?

If nothing excuses taking another life, Charlie Kirk’s opinions and beliefs are irrelevant to his murder aren’t they?

So what if he did? David Icke supports conspiracy theories. Does that make him a bad person?

Who have I tried to cancel?

Did he? So what?

That was literally his entire stated aim

Learn the difference between disagreement and cancellation

Yes it is. You can say whatever, I can criticise you for it. That is precisely what free speech is.

Apart from a single response, at no point have I tried to stop people posting. You’re confusing disagreement with cancellation