Search results

What do you think she meant?

No they’re small business owners. Not sure I understand the relevance of that question. Don’t be provocative by going into London then. That’s your solution isn’t it?

So someone who thinks farmers earning £30k a year shouldn’t be subject to £400k worth of IHT is a radical, but Starmer and Co who are threatening the stability of our food supply is a sensible moderate?

So what did she mean then?

You think Jeremy Clarkson is a radical? 😂😂🤡

Well it’s in relation to someone being shot, seemingly for voicing their opinions. She’s telling him not to voice his opinions as the solution. I can only assume you agree with that?

Yes, because he definitely meant that literally didn’t he Do you work for the Metropolitan Police by any chance?

Well it’s in relation to a public figure being shot

Mask is slipping for a lot of the self proclaimed “nice people” This tweet for me summed it up for me. Jeremy Clarkson expressing concern about the safety of voicing his opinions, to be told by a “comedian” that so long as he shuts up he won’t be shot

If I said anything untoward against you then I apologise. I came on here last night straight from twitter, where the most disgusting things were being said

Oh well, at least we’re getting massive NHS reforms now…..

This comes across as a classic example of “my side of the divide is always right”

I’d hardly call it a right wing govt, but yes. Any reforms didn’t go far enough

Despite record sums of money, the NHS is failing. We’re falling behind other countries. It’s clear it needs some time of modernisation/reform, yet any attempts to do that are branded as privatisation by some. Meanwhile the NHS falls down international league tables every year

It’s not about keeping it or getting rid of it. It’s about reforming it. Any time someone tries to change it they get accused of wanting to privatise it

No the opposite. I consider the right to innocence till proven guilty to be so important that I accept guilty people will walk free. People are literally getting away with murder yet I still support that right. That doesn’t mean I want murders to happen The same goes for the gun fanatics in...

The American right act with guns the same way that the British left act with the NHS. Any attempt at reforming it is a complete no go

And that is the same with many of the right to bear arms lot. Frankly I don’t understand the American right’s obsession with guns, but I can understand you can support a legal right, accept it has consequences, but still not want those consequences to happen

With overwhelming evidence, otherwise you assume they are innocent. However in doing that we know murderers will escape justice. But we consider that a price worth paying to uphold the basic right of innocent till proven guilty

You support a legal system that you know lets killers walk free? Yes?