Search results

I would suggest that being 17th in league 1 after 23 games leads to the inevitable conclusion that none of our strikers are exactly pulling up trees. Do any justify their reputation or their wages?

Yes we have exactly the same ambition as all the other shitty teams in this league. Something to be proud of I suppose.

Of course I would prefer Waitrose myself

Do you understand what Otis means at all? Or are you deliberately missing the point?

A thought has just occurred to me. Usually football clubs get in bed with a big retailer to get a scheme going. The retailer benefits from association with the sporting use and they bring the necessary money to the table. If any approach has been made by the retailer and not the football club...

The main reason it wouldn't be Warwick Uni is that there would be no benefit for the owners of CCFC. The whole purpose of building a new ground is to increase the value of any associated land. Why would the club do that for Warwick Uni who own the land? If as seems the case under FOI no proper...

Just reading this thread from the start it seems most people would haver taken 0-0 before the game (the reality is that Chesterfield have performed better this season than we have). Pressley played with an attacking formation that everyone should have been happy with. The strikers didn't...

What have CCC and Wasps got to do with following CCFC?

Of course you're in a minority otherwise we would be getting 25000 every game. But a proper supporter follows their team no matter what division they're in. If you only support the team when they are doing well then what are you a supporter of? Having said this there are too many other reasons...

Pressley has fallen out with a number of players which is affecting his team selections. I don't understand why some of the players (loanees)are still here.

The title of the thread may be accurate but it is irrelevant to the club's owners. Pressley is achieving what they want, which is playing on a shoestring. They aren't interested in the football. They are only interested in the club as an entity. He won't be sacked.

we actually had had 49% possession when Barton was sent off.

The main point here is that SISU have zero interest in the football. It is just a continual drain on resources. The reason they want to build a new stadium is so they upgrade the value of any associated land. The increased value would have to cover the cost of the new stadium. As Chief Dave...

First time I have seen City this season and my comments will allow that this was an improved performance on what has been played this season. I think the OP is pretty good with his assessment but to be perfectly honest it is irrelevant how individuals perform. They are doing their best but...

Tim Fisher reveals details of Ricoh bid .................or in fact reveals chuff all

Isn't the manner of how we are playing more important than our position. We played some good football last season and the season before whereas now even die hards are saying it is sh*t and the players don't look interested.

or indeed Peterborough.

Especially for people who are trying to slow down?

I wouldn't stop going to games just because of poor results. (Although probably the majority do and have). You can't say that our chances of winning more than we lose have ever been very high. I think what is underlying the OP is the feeling that the owners have pulled the rug from under the...