The more I think about it what was Margaret thinking of when she set the law out on this,and what modification has been applied,it surely would been a broadcasters responsibility or a journalist she was thinking at that time?
It's certainly a a sector that may need revisions, I'd actually have the platforms for speech crimes legislated against, how to do it though I mean they're just amplifier to nutter's that wouldn't get an audience half the time!
Anyway the deal's, do we think there was logic applied in the order, scale and value in them?
Possibly genius move or desperate actions and flailing around?
It's a bit of a joke that they think that, we mugged Brighton off,the real crime is that no one was prepared to gamble on him at the time.
Anyway only could have gained About five more million out of it if that was the case.
Well I think Matt SB house move was dependent on it,and that's fair enough if people want that kind of content,as I say club could or should get on board and do something with them.
Maybe it's an understanding of the way thing's work for that kind,if he's ever had his arm twisted or been corrupted by financial choices on a public body?
Against a team in cruise mode,who did the goals come from in our barnstorming spell, they can't have all come from defenders, I advocate a system with 5 at the back.
How did analogue get turned off,cost, they've asked for it if that's the case, who's the beneficiary of all this,the one's providing all of the digital tech?
Let's hope he's wanted by a few clubs out there then,it does seem like the time and possibly planned for,tbh I'm surprised both him and Simms weren't hawked around last year for the model to work as it should