Search results

I'd have put one in as well but it's not mentioned. A sell-on percentage could work for us in a similar way that puts us in front position because whatever fee we paid we'd get a 'rebate' due to that. So we could put in a higher bid than others because we'd be getting so much of it back.

Neither way is ideal but I prefer the one that gives them the opportunity than the one that denies it. It's not like these people are now just being told "you start as a doctor Monday". They've still got a very long and arduous course to get through to qualify over the next seven years. If...

Yep

That puts marriage on a rocky road right from the start...

One thing they've definitely got to take notice of this year is the Sky games as they show a lot more Championship. But that shouldn't be hard to do by just 'blacking out' those games that are live on Sky.

They seem to focus heavily on the Ed I, William Wallace, Robert the Bruce, Bannockburn etc which is 13th C. They have a bit about the Stuarts and them being forced off the throne by William and Mary, but seem to ignore the fact that a Union between Scotland and England occurred because a...

Good luck to him. Should be getting a lot of gametime now.

Because they're told it's great over here by smugglers. Can't make any money out of people if you tell them "Do you know what? It's better here actually"

Possibly. But like I say in that case both could pay roughly half of it (Wasps a bit less as they've already paid some) to whatever equals 50:50. But good luck to anyone trying to get that sorted! One thing I would say won't happen is that if Wasps can't afford it and give the stadium back...

Fine. Will you marry me?

It seems to me because they haven't come back out and said "they're utter bastards and to blame for everything", which is what you want to be the case really, you've decided the meeting was therefore a waste of time and they've been hoodwinked.

You could do a pro-rata thing. So see what the difference is and how much that is compared to what was originally paid and then whatever that percentage is is how much ownership you get. If the difference comes to over 50% of the price Wasps could pay some of it, similarly if it's under 50%...

Since his two big knee injuries he's played most games, and a fair few of those he's missed has been managerial tactics changes. Most players have little niggly injuries they pick up over the course of the season they play through with and sort them out post-season.

BoyleSports won the game of Blackjack the two were playing.

Can't see either the council or Wasps being happy with that, given this is the fifth time SISU have brought action regarding the stadium in some way or another and lost the first four they would feel why should they be made to accept the first decision that has gone against them? Like a game of...

Does Kay not earn enough presenting Sky News? Didn't she complain about the gravel though? Can't be comfortable and might get places you don't want!

Someone's already asked about the meaning of future legal action and if the ECJ thing is classed as future or current? Given that so many have said the investigation is not "legal action" then it would suggest that anything linked to that investigation would have to be considered future legal...

It's a fair point and is an option off the bench to help defend a lead but are we going to be likely to spend most of next season looking to defend a lead late on or to score? I'd suggest the latter and If we're looking for a goal Max would arguably be the better option as he's got that genius...

Have we taken on many first year scholars this year?

We are assuming that Moyes (or indeed all managers) have control of signings. To the average fan it seems obvious that the person in charge of the team should be choosing who they want to sign but that isn't necessarily the case.