Search results

No it isn’t, it’s purely a statement of fact.

Yes, I believe they could still do that, But wasps may say we are not going to offer you a new tenancy if you continue to do that. Which would make life very difficult for ccfc.

I’m not making excuses for wasps, I’m just pointing out their position.

If wasps don’t deal with sisu, then sisu have no grounds for litigation. If wasps do deal with sisu, then sisu could make any bs up, or wait for any issue to arise, regardless of however petty, and then initiate a legal action. That is sisu’s M.O. sisu could literally use any minor...

If wasps refuse to give sisu/ccfc a deal, what grounds would there be for a legal case against them? Unless there was a clause stating that ccfc must have access to the ground for ever, And I’m sure we would of heard that.

That’s politics for you. I wouldn’t like to deal with any the sides involved myself. It comes down to who you thing is bullshitting the least.

No, I’m saying why would Wasps deal with sisu/ccfc at all. If Wasps deal with sisu, wasps leave themselves open to possible future legal action, So don’t deal with sisu full stop. The effect on sisu/ccfc if they have no ground available is potentially devastating, But that is not the intent...

It may well of been just PR, or blatant BS. If they are legaly obliged to offer a reasonable tenancy, I’d be very surprised that we havnt heard about it by now.

But sisu will not fund a loss making venture for ever, once all legal avenues have finally been exhausted, they will have to either sell the club, wind the club up, or start new litigation. Hence the risk to Wasps.

I dont believe Wasps are legaly obliged to offer ccfc a rental deal (although I’m not 100% sure). But if they chose not to deal with ccfc/sisu then surely they would make themselves immune from any legal action. What grounds would sisu have?

The comment about £1m rent was an ironic statement, relating to the fact that that was the original rental figure, and as I said that would bring events “full circle”. As in nothing changed after so many years wasted and all the legal cases etc etc. etc. I do get what chefdave said, but as...

Unfortunately, just saying that you don’t care about sisu, ACL, wasps etc etc, dosnt make them any less relevant. They are the main protagonists whether YOU like it or not. The political issues won’t just go away because the fans (me included) don’t like to consider the worse case sonario...

According to the bbc sport page, there was no disallowed goal, no second yellow card, and no sending off, Tossers.

Bed time!

LEMON SQUEEZYYYY

Don’t get a cob on!

Chaplin’s on a roll !

Doyle’s shit at dead balls.

Ffs dosnt JCH know, we don’t score goals in the first half!!!

Funny isn’t it, TF says the Ricoh is only worth 3M, but the whole legal issue centred around sisu’s claim that the council undervalued the Ricoh arena by 30M when selling to wasps, and that constituted state aid. Honestly, you couldn’t make it up. Not surprised they lost.