Search results

Woosh... It's a joke about the company :banghead::stop:

Eaden did yesterday.

Well at least if there is no swelling it almost certainly rules out ACL, as if you tear that it almost always swells. Could be medial but then again it would have some small amount of welling 9/10. But could still be anything else. Who would say anywhere between couple weeks- 3/4 months. Off...

Well I guess after the prison, where they were comfortable and had to stay for the babies sake, they were trying to cure the disease because of Eugenes lie, so they were heading a lot further inland to DC. Then when you find somewhere to rebuild why would you leave? No point in running, best...

Apologies, bbc sport was wrong on the day, it had given the wrong number for Thomas so I had assumed it was a different Thomas.

Yeah but I think that only happens if it is a 'frivolous' appeal, if the board understands why it was appealed, then they don't extend the ban I don't think?

Yeah it's only one game, for the reasons that you said.

Disappointing if it is serious, may lead to a change in system though if both he and McNulty are out?

In the most reason series, I have been thinking how much the group could do with someone like Shane. While he was nuts, he was right from the start about what was needed to survive, and he would be invaluable to the group, even though I hated him. Also had a discussion at work in terms of...

Band of brothers was my favourite series before walking dead. Brilliant. If you liked that. Then HBO did another series like it called -the Pacific- which is very similar and made by the same people, but as the name suggests it is about the battle in the Pacific Ocean against the Japanese.

Yeah, although it might be worth an appeal still anyway imo. Especially if Davies or Willis picked up any knocks? I know some mentioned that they were limping at some point in the game?

It is a fact that he gets the train to most games, occasionally he does drive, but have seen him multiple times getting the train

No only 1 match ban as it is seen as a 'professional foul'. It's only a 3 match ban if it is violent conduct, or dangerous foul play.

Yes so like I said it was relaxed? And if the foul was accidental, i.e. He made a genuine attempt It's not a red card, like I said? To me he is trying to play the ball, or at least trying to get himself between the goal and the player, so not a red card. But it's happened and we move on

Can't really tell from that angle, but you probably have a better idea than I do

Didn't Robins say, that in training his kicking is decent? And that it's only in matches that it's so shocking, and it's due to anxiety. The only way I see him getting better if that's the case is more and more game time, and getting over his anxiety

Disagree, I think if Rod doesn't foul him, stokes wasn't closing him down fast enough to stop him getting 1vs1 and getting a shot away. And even if he gets across, it's a simple pass across for a tap in. However as I said, it looks like an accident to me, so not sure it it's a sending off by...

Good finish by Jodi, but that is some of the worst defending I have seen, how can you give that much space to anybody that close to your goal. If I was Brown, I would be ripping my players heads off, absolutely no pressure on Jodi for that goal.

However wasn't the rule relaxed last season? To the extent that if it looked like an accident that it was no longer a sending off? It doesn't seem like it was definitely on purpose?

Yes but as part of denying a goal scoring opportunity, the location and number of players between the attacker and the goal is one of the key determining factors in deciding it. Which is why the term is used, about 'last man'.