Search results

But on that same metric v QPR both teams had a very similar xG. According to that we should have maybe scraped a fortunate win. Reality was we absolutely dominated the game and could (probably should) have scored more

Tell me you realise that not all pensioners have worked their entire lives (and a small number will have barely worked at all) and so will not have contributed tax and NI for 50 years or more? Tell me you realise that the calculations made when they were paying into the system were based on...

Are these packs done by Panini or Marlboro?

Ask Thomas and Kitching at the game tomorrow. Pretty sure they'll find them still in their pockets.

Quite good. Badly edited. Is Panorama so in a hole about what it can and can't show they're having to show the Ashes highlights to fill the time?

Learn to read. Literally the very last sentence states I thought the Labour manifesto was very vague. I was making a sarky comment of just how little substance was in the Boris one that Labour's was comprehensive IN COMPARISON

"I could've gone out with the really pretty girl over there, but I just thought you were a nicer person overall so I chose you"

Indeed they can't. Why would 28.5k Cov fans be at other teams games?

So not willing to provide the proof that many pensioners, especially those over a certain age, aren't a net drain on the economy or that everyone on welfare is I see. Oh, and you've been told at least two other times on here its r I diculous. With an I. Silly little errors like that can make...

Is this the face that launched a thousand quips? Well, one quip a thousand times.

So it's basically a very dark version of Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life.

How you can talk about Truss claiming to continue the 2019 manifesto when she clearly just changed everything in one fell swoop trying to cosplay Thatcher. As for the Labour manifesto being vague - do you actually remember the Tory 2019 one under Boris? It had nothing in it except for "Get...

Proof please. Prove that all the pensioners have created the wealth that provides the money in the system. Given the sums that were done on people's life expectancy and how much they would need to set aside to cover their retirement anyone around or above the age of 80 will have already used up...

Because it creates an impression that some people are worth less than others. To sub or de humanise them. Like the term untermensch. And who decides what an underclass consists of? Is it purely down to financial security? Because there are plenty of very well off individuals who could...

Given who his inner circle is reputed to be 'beak' is probably apt in more ways than one.

But then the entire chorus negates that by clearly stating numerous times "We'll Live and Die In These Towns". In doesn't say "We'll Live In These Towns But Die In A Nice Village Because Things Will Get Better"

Ok. So let's give young people, many of whom will have no knowledge whatsoever of how to invest, a lump sum of money. I think most of those people would require someone to manage that money and investments on their behalf to ensure it's invested wisely. But that's a lot of people who's money...

Now repeat that sentence, but change one word. Where it says 'pensioners', replace it with 'welfare claimants'. Would you still agree with the sentence? And if not, why not, given that pensions are a higher figure than welfare payouts?

So you're calling working class people an 'underclass' now are you...?