Search results

May take a long time Higgs charity just bought a successful concern in the city centre. Must be some coffers still in the pot.

How much profit has been made from the cash cow? What has been done with this profit?

With one party banding round figures of 6 million whilst considering building new of lesser quality, with less potential in a poorer location at a debt of 40 million. Agreeing a price seems a tad unrealistic to me

They bought it for its true value Who is not to say SISU were going to try and under value it. Who is to say the bank would have accepted that

I don't know where we would be without them. Well actually I do Coventry

And so on and so on and so on Luckily the moral police more commonly known as hedge funds are out there. They are watching and at their own expense with no personal gain challenging such erroneous unscrupulous council behaviour. Hoorah for our heroes the hedge funds

http://www.indymediascotland.org/node/15775

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/district/eastleigh/9380406.Rose_Bowl_could_be_bailed_out_by_council/?ref=arc

http://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/news/10362026.Bus_company_given_council_bailout/

I presume they have not done it with Sixfields, otherwise you would have question anyone who has problem with this. Helping to give it some credence by attending Sixfields.

I think formula one should latch onto this request a JR and attempt to buy Coombe Abbey for 60k

Not sure what your issue is? Mr Fisher said the JR is a hedge-fund taking a moral stance and there is no financial gain for SISU. What makes you think, he thinks we are a bit thick and will believe anything?

What if the owners invest in the team and make a genuine attempt at success. Surely your attendance figures are based on a team in the championship/third division. Whose ambition was Lower mid table/avoid relegation at best?

I heard this was around the time SISU decided to follow a different path.

What is strange is when people go to lengths creating conspiracy theories such as people rigging polls. Intentionally trying leading questions. Rival fans high jacking polls etc etc. I think this is the third or fourth survey/poll that has come out with similar results. I am confident it is...

Nope people just quoting the evidence provided by a poll. It is the only bit of evidence people have to discuss Other than discussing the words of people and the actions of people. No one criticises people for creating headlines or discussing these things. So surely it is natural for the most...

So people are again whinging about polls Unless someone is sad enough to sit for hours on end to rig a poll. Which the importance of this one means that that is very very unlikely. Then we should give it credit and pay attention to it.

I would say 97% are boycotting

I believe that when poll says 60% of people believe something. It is far more important and we should focus on the 35% of people who believe something else.

I get the impression he is referring to the guardian