Also, I'm testing a theory tomorrow. I have been to all but 2 of our home games - the 2 we've won! I'm not going tomorrow to test this out. If we win I have no idea what I'm going to do on Saturdays for the rest of the season!
Jesus Christ! Nobody's being gullible. It's not gullible to talk about it. Who cares anyway, I mean what exactly is it to you if some people don't want to act fucking suicidal. Insult your your own supporters by calling them mugs... well done.
I remember Leicester abusing the rules (and Leeds, didn't they?). But I still would have thought if you go into administration once it would hold off the threat of it again for more than 2 years?
I don't understand Swindon's or Rotherham's? They were both in administration twice, 2 years after the first time. I'm not interested in the financial side of the game enough to learn anything about it (sorry to those that are)! But it's my understanding that when a club is in administration, an...
Huh? I think the article means he's been told a budget. If he's just been told that, how would he have known it for 4 months?
SW88 - Don't think Kean played for Wimbledon, although I'm not 100% certain
Oh my God! Not.... discussing targets! Hang me now. Then draw and quarter me. And actually, nobody's discussing targets. It clearly says in the article that a prem manager that Thorn used to play with has offered a couple of players. People are trying to figure out who the manager/team/players...
WHAT?! Because we're debating on what team it MIGHT be that's offered us a couple of players, which it actually SAYS in the article?! Go read the definition of gullible
Either of those would be great. I don't think it would be Gosling though as, from what Thorn's said, he would be too young?
Pardew's the only one I can think of that's played with Thorn. You think of any one else?
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10269~2504651,00.html
Obviously, budget won't be great. But I'm more interested in trying to work out who the manager is!
Pardew? That's the only one I can think of?
Oh, you're talking about the direct, long ball approach the players seemed to take in the 2nd half on Tuesday as opposed to the passing shown in the first half. The same 2nd half we let 3 goals in? Sounds like a great idea to me
He's had his chances - that is multiple chances by the way - and he's shown no desire to get himself match fit so I wouldn't see the point in giving him another chance. Shame and a waste.