Search results

In the end we had to accept the Villa bid because it met the clause. If we'd not given him the new contract we may have got more cos we'd have had the right to say no to the Villa bid. Didn't Blackburn supposedly put in a bigger bid but he refused to leave so we ended up getting less? That seems...

I do get Rob's point. It would be fun to see all the drivers in exactly the same cars to settle who is the best driver. Simiarly it would be nice to let the constructors just do whatever they want to (mainly just having safety regs) and see what weird and wonderful innovations they come up with.

If you're putting in a release clause the whole point is you want it to be high so that people don't trigger it. If the clause gets met it almost certainly means they'd have been willing to pay more and you've not got the best value for the asset as you could. Why would you give a player a new...

To be fair Truss wasn't a Brexiteer, just another blowing with the wind to appease her own delusioned ambitions.

Next week, I'll be in Beijing, trying to open up new migrant detention centres

So the solution to a lack of competition is...a lack of competition? If you're worried about a lack of competition in the PL wait until you hear about the Bundesliga and Ligue 1! Or we could do things that might actually stop it being noncompetitive with things like squad limits for players...

He'd have the opposition players for breakfast.

⬇ And that's just the one post.

It's the Telegraph, so expect him to sign a 5yr extension.

That would be fine if it were coming from anyone but the person on here who is consistently proven to be wrong.

Is this the new Catholic method of physio?

Like an ice cream van but playing LAST as it drives around

Exactly. Truss is just repeating what she hears because she doesn't understand and is trying to look like she does. Sunak is so wealthy and detached he has no idea of the importance of the services it provides and has an antiquated view of economics. It still baffles e how the Tories have this...

There is some equivalence. They've basically got someone to give them the money now (at a cost) intending to pay it back when they actually get paid.

Why would we be giving a load of Sunderland players a run out?

I have a feeling EV's won't be seen as quite the answer they are now either, due to the batteries and the processes required in getting hold of the materials, but I guess at the moment it's solve the most pressing crisis first. With all the lithium are we going to see more people struggling to...

Always wanted Gabriel Heinze to be #57

It's considered an unlucky number, as those wearing tend to go down.

Goes to show nothing can be trusted when you add a financial incentive to it. While we cling to it as an outdated measure of success we're even more fucked than we already will be.