Search results

Will be interesting to see how Republicans respond. Will they back their countries judicial system or a individual who clearly only has his own interests at heart. If the majority back Trump they're effectively declaring war on their country as well as turning it into an international joke.

I agree the vast majority of their attention should be based on Britain, but I don't think I'd want someone who completely ignored things overseas.

I'm sure I read a previous post from someone on here adamant that he was a Liverpool fan. I thought it was Man Utd?

Would be madness if true. Club have been fed up of people using concessionary tickets illegally but someone tries to do the right thing and is denied. No wonder people don't bother. Just tell the sister to have heavy make-up, a sky blue rinse, wear a cardie and a headscarf and walk with a...

Yeah... all well and good as squad fillers but where's the big name signing to get the fans excited?

If you scale up private practice to the size and scope of the NHS it would have WAY more non-clinical staff.

Probably not. But it's a simple change to the laws that would even out the competition to a fairer extent. Matter of no will to do it rather than it being a hard thing to do.

Well that kind of proves my point. Indeed, the UK economy as a whole is smaller than in 2008. Yet according to the year on year statistics 13 of those years are growth years. Misleading, no? You need more indicators to get a fuller picture.

Well if you're taking out loans and mortgages for private school you clearly can't afford to do it.

Going back to the Great Depression it's been shown that during recessions it's spending that makes the biggest difference. The building of 30Rock in NY made a significant difference locally by providing jobs and the knock-on effect that had,

Well that's bollocks. Why wouldn't pubic sector have impetus to cut costs and drive efficiencies? They do that and the money they spend goes further. Thus they can either reduce taxes and be popular or have money to spend on improving other services and be more popular. Why, for example...

Or to stop them hoarding players restrict all teams to 40 pro-contracted players, regardless of age, nationality or which academy they came through. Good youngsters at top academies but won't play for that team for a fair few years - instead of being loaned out in perpetuity for years they get...

I think as a back-up formation it might. Arguably more likely than a 5ATB. We've got players to fit that formation as it stands, Sheaf, Eccles or Torp in the centre, Saka and EMC as wingers and Wright and Simms up front. Could even argue Tavares could be a wildcard playing in a two up front...

But we've had growth (albeit small growth) yet people are getting poorer overall. So it already shows that growth does not mean everyone gets something. Just because that growth figure goes up doesn't mean the poorer will get any of it. And if they don't it makes their situation a lot worse...

Can we agree that if we play a forward three we play a centre forward and two inside forwards rather than a centre forward and two wingers?

Possibly. Could be useful for tax purposes though. Points for and against for doing it, though the for seem to me to be more liquid which is a big incentive. Just wondered if it was actually a potential thing they could do.

Why not treat your penis. They did most of the work after all.

While I agree with some of that, it's far too simplistic to just say 'growth'. If you want growth then the most vital thing has to be WHERE and WHO gets that growth. Without that information then it's meaningless. Most of the country could be getting poorer while a handful of people just chuck a...

They can't. As council run they'd be being seen as not being impartial and that's against election rules.

Another stripey kit then. Though obviously the stripes will be all wrong.