Search results

only if you don't include the loans out but do include the loans in which doesn't seem a reasonable position to me,

and we should be comparing to the offer that was on the table when they left and not the original rent. While their actions with withholding rent was scummy it was effective up to a certain point. Otium will never make back the money it lost by choosing to go to northampton instead of staying at...

It really doesn't, through the eyes of the Otium Directors, not the fans, looking dispassionately at nothing but the short and long term success of Otium Entertainment, Tim Fisher and Mark Labovich are not doing their jobs. Anyway off to bed, goodnight.

why would you bother reporting him? we saw exactly how good they are at making sure directors do their jobs when it came to submitting accounts, when they were way overdue they wrote them a letter and when they were incredibly overdue they sent them a sterner letter and then they let them get...

I started a thread a few months back asking the same question ie are the directors fulfilling their duties and all the people you would expect shot it down, Grendel was particularly vitriolic.

Maybe my memory is bad but I don't think any of that is true, Otium never had the lease, The lease was broken at the same time as Otium became the football club, By the time Otium were the football club ACL were already offering fantastic deals, the best interests of Otium at that time was to do...

oh and I know the response to this so I'll save you the typing, blah blah blah, long term future, blah blah blah, food and beverage revenues, I don't believe it, you don't believe it, Tim Fisher doesn't believe it, Mark Labovich doesn't believe it, moving to Northampton was not in the best...

Tim Fisher isn't doing his job, his job and legal responsibility as a director of Otium entertainment is do what is best for Otium entertainment he is not doing that, he is doing what Joy Seppala thinks is best for Arvo Masterfund and SISU. If Tim Fisher and Mark Labovich were doing their jobs...

because of the 2 issues acl wanted sorted before talking the JR is clearly the most important one, the plan with the jr is to destroy them, why on earth would they enter negotiations with sisu under that cloud?

You are very eloquent and polite today, congratulations.

I can put myself in ACL's shoes, would I do a deal with someone who is sueing me and whose intention is to bankrupt me? no I would not, so it would be completely unreasonable of me to demand that from ACL.

no it won't, ACL have already said (completely reasonably) that they won't discuss until the JR is dropped,

Once sisu drop the JR sure, but we both knew they arn't doing that.

february? .

I thought that and wondered if thats why a hold was put on the liquidation, Presumably they are there so that there is more damages to sue for if sisu win.

Yet fisher says there will have to be an appeal because the mean judge said nasty things about sisu.

A mature discussion was taking place, better ruin it.

Well that that shows unequivicably that sisu will be appealing further, there really is no hope of us getting back to the Ricoh over the next couple of months. :-(

Thats what the court document says duffer, the judge ordered that the funds held by sisus solicitors be released. The Claimants shall release to the Defendant within 7 days of service of this Order the sum of £100,000, together with interest accrued thereon, which is held by the Claimants...

Actually while the 2 documents have the 18th on them I've just noticed that on the one that has been stamped by the court the stamp has the date of the 22nd