Search results

Labour have a complex voter base to consider, and as such have always had to try and find a position that could unite two disprite positions.

It wasn’t a poll - it was a vote on social media. Simple really, ask a large sample size a question. And before you pull out the line of possible bias.. there were 4 votes all indicating a similar theme. Unlikely that bias towards Labour contributed to the result in all of them, especially when...

Do they?

Nonsense... sample size is a far bigger indicator.

A poll of 1600 is more accurate than one of 30000? Stats is not your strong point. As I said... let’s see what happens when the real poll happens.

More people want an answer about why the NHS is fucked, or why there are millions having to use food banks.

I didn’t say that did I? I said the 15% gap is not necessarily credible or accurate. Also 2 million under 35 have registered to vote since announcement of election. This is 900,000 more than same period in 2017.

Feel free to check out the voting results yourself...

Last night you said Johnson won, now it’s a draw? Corbyn won, you know it, I know it.

Maybe because all the polling companies think that only about a third of people under 25 will vote. Re-adjusted polls to reflect 2017 turnout alone have the gap at less than 5%

you usually pay double for that.

Indeed

Fuck me that’s some next level fantasy... you should see if HBO want to do a series.

Corbyn clearly won that.

Thats insane.... mid table mediocrity beckons.

I think that turnout for this election is again being seriously underplayed. Voter registrations again could be crucial - supposedly in excess of 1.5 million new voters since election called, and still 8 days to go. EDIT: It’s actually 1.78 million

Nothing says let’s return to the days of the British Empire like ‘let’s break up the Empire’

Too easy for you that...

Let’s see how this plays out....

Labour only have to stop the Tories getting a majority outright.