Search results

You can mitigate for some of these with in school policies on mobile-phones for example. You can’t apply them in the same way via Teams.

So is Angela Rayner? Is he going to suspend his deputy?

OK then - so if we put that one to aside for a second you are comparing a guy who rolled out some pretty basic AS tropes a few days after RLB being disciplined by Starmer for her promotion of the article by Maxine Peake. Some consistency at the very least.

Students recording images/video of staff, other students. Staff/students viewing or witnessing things happening in the background of their peers Student making a disclosure whilst in a live lesson Thats just 3 obvious ones that came up when idea was talked about. I think it’s mostly about...

I would agree with what your mate says here. Live lessons do raise massive safeguarding issues and I for one would not do them nor allow my team to for that reason. We are prepared for 2/3 different scenarios from kids in on a rota basis to full 100% lockdown. Most schools could turn round and...

I am stating that the extent and the number of instances is exaggerated - not that the problem does not exist. Your response implies that it’s institutional which is why I challenged it. So tell me why Starmer hasn’t gone the same zero tolerance on Reeves or Reed for example, but happy to act...

How is it a FFS? Basic maths tells you that the number of upheld complaints against Lab members alone was less that 0.05% - is that what you call institutional???

OK - so why in the report does it say that the process improved under Corbyn’s leadership? That doesn’t make it better at all and levelling failure here is justified, but they were shambolic before 2015 and especially under the remit of Ian McNicol.

I can see your point. If he felt like this then he should have been suing some people when this broke 2 years ago, because there are some people that have weaponised this.

Pretty sure his opening line did accept that there was AS in Labour that needs to be removed. Let’s see where this goes next.

Hang on - there are many ways to interpret that. The claim was that Labour was ‘institutionally antisemitic’ - that has not been borne out in the report. Their are 2 reports of unlawful actions - that again is not institutional. You can state these points without being in denial of having a problem.

Not by Labour or Starmer no, but the inference is being pedalled by the media. The problem with this action is that it is inconsistent with how Starmer has responded to other AS issues since becoming leader. If you are going to be zero tolerance you have to be on everybody - but just the ones...

It needs to go to court and be settled once and for all. I don’t believe he is an antisemite - but now he has the opportunity to prove it. I think the Labour Party have just accelerated an inevitable split that the Tories will be lapping up as everyone has switched their attention to this.

If you like Horror then I’d recommend ‘The Haunting of Bly Manor’ - clever and sinister in equal measure.

Fuck me - you’ve swallowed the Daily Mail propaganda well and truly. Zero hours contracts, UC that isn’t fit for purpose, whilst you get screwed to pieces by shitty landlords because you’re never getting on the property ladder..... but it’s all about that 0.0001% that try and cheat the system...

You could have stuck an extra week on the half term to begin with, and just made sure those Tory c**** provide food for those that need it. No impact educationally whatsoever.

Ideology trumps science.

If you want to keep transmitting the virus then sure.

National secondary attendance is down to 80%

I think whoever said it wasn’t a big factor was talking out of their arse to be honest. It might be that the level of people get ill is low comparatively, but it’s basically a virus breeding ground.