Search results

Only takes one wrong un to ruin a life forever. So why don't you make a post against those who try to defend Nandy? Not difficult to do. But you always jump on my posts like those who are doing so now. The UK is going crazy. To me if you have meat and two veg you go where blokes go. Once a...

Again you come out with the school line. So children only get changed at school? OK Nandy for PM. What could go wrong? Wee Krankie was a one off. Did she resign for no reason? But if you have daughters would you be happy for them to get changed in an area that any bloke says he identifies as...

Why don't you ask Nandy? Go swimming? Nandy wants anyone who says they identify as a woman to use women's facilities. If I take my daughters swimming I can't go in with them unless I identify as a woman. School was never mentioned. Do you have daughters? If you do you will understand my...

Good answer. My biggest concern is my daughters, the youngest is 14, having to share facilities with any bloke who says he identifies as a woman. No proof at all needed. What people like Nandy wants is total freedom of anyone who says they identify as a woman. Google is everyone's friend. Easy...

So she would be happy to share her space with another woman. But that wasn't the question. Would she be happy to share her personal space with any bloke who identifies as a woman? Or are you saying there are no wrong uns that will use it to their advantage?

Yes but she wants more. And how about your partner sharing her private space with any bloke who says he identifies as a woman? If you're OK with that try asking your partner what she thinks. Look at what has just happened to wee Krankie. And you try to defend someone who goes even further...

And yet again who has said he is a perfect fit? So who would you prefer as Labour leader?

If a 15 year old doesn't know how is a 13 year old supposed to know? Were your thoughts as a 13 year old correct? And would you be happy for your partner to share her personal space with any bloke who says he identifies as a woman?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/01/19/labours-lisa-nandy-suggests-13-year-olds-should-able-change/

She certainly has. My wife is best friends of the Unite Union person in charge of our county. I also know her well from other means. Nandy was her choice of Labour leader. The book is a decent read. But Labour leader? She is worse than wee krankie from Scotland. She is all for 13 year olds...

Ah so you haven't read the article or you don't want to admit that the headline doesn't match the wording of the rest of the article. Come on then. Who do you prefer to Starmer?

And as has been said a fair few times now nobody has said he is perfect. Far from it. Yet those who keep coming out with the same lines can't come out with someone better. At this present time we have a decent chance of a Labour win next election with Starmer in charge. A much better prospect...

'Starmer appeared to say'. Same as usual. A newspaper comes out with a headline that is different to the story they come out with. The very left of the Labour Party don't like him. They want Corbyn back.

Exactly. The UK is run by the most dishonest government for a very long time. Tax dodging, law breaking, clear lies and much more. Nobody from Labour has a clue how bad things really are or how worse it will get before the next election. Yes we all want things to vastly improve. But national...

Has he said he will not end or change outsourcing?

That is one. But a few on here seem to make out it is nearly every single one.

I agree with you. But who is there that would be better than Starmer for Labour? Not one person has answered this question.

Correct. I still don't know which so called pledges you want me to reply to so asked you which they are. And as usual you always expect a reply to questions but don't like replying to them yourself so come out with comments like this one. I'll try yet again. Which pledges are you on about which...

Of course you are. Because you can't answer a simple question. Theresa May lost her position as PM because she promised what couldn't be afforded because of the state of the economy. If Starmer did the same he would be finished. Then who would we have? You have already admitted you don't know...

He isn't enough to the left for some. They would prefer (although nobody will name who they would prefer) someone further to the left who wouldn't get elected. This is the part I can never understand.