Search results

But that in turn also makes it less likely for Sisu to sell the club on and make a return on their investment.

I think how it is for a lot of people is they still care about the club, but find it hard to care about individual results anymore. As much as I want the club to progress, I struggle to feel anything after a result, win or draw. My caring of Ccfc is now about its long term survival rather...

I find it difficult to believe that any alternative owners could be worse to the most incompetent people in the FL.

Surely we all want Sisu out? No one likes or supports them apparently.

And that will help our club how?

Why are the self proclaimed "I only care about the football club" lot so upset about something that had no effect on the football club?

So are you. I'm just making assumptions from the opposite side.

I'm just talking about the law mate. I don't know what Les Reid lost his job for, but if he disobeyed his superiors instructions then that would be a sackable offence in most organisations.

That would be for the editor of the CET to come out and say. If, as alleged, the editor of the CET was happy to not print a certain story then how can that be blackmail or bribery?

No and No.

The editor of CET is perfectly entitled prevent him from reporting it, he was his boss. Bosses tell their employees not to do things all the time. This is exactly the type of thing I'm on about. The mind game tactics that some journalists use. Half the forum is now up in arms thinking that CCC...

No because its a family member. All I will say is a certain Telegraph reporter suggested someone in my family had done something wrong which had not a shred of truth to it. When you know someone you care about is completely innocent yet their name is being turned to mud because a jumped up...

I cant stand the man. I have seen first hand ways in which its been suggested innocent people have done something wrong with a sensationalist headline (which the article then bares no resemblance to the headline).

So in this instance, who hasn't allowed it?

Not really, they didn't have freedom of the press in the USSR.

What? So press freedom means a newspaper has to print everything? To me freedom means you have the choice to do something or not do something. If that is strange to you then I don't really know what to say.

Presumably the Telegraph is free to print whatever it wishes? I was under the impression that we have press freedom in the UK and the Telegraph is under no obligation to print Reid's ranting's.

No it isn't, we were the 11th best supported team in the division. 1 Liverpool 39582 2 Manchester United 39152 3 Arsenal 29910 4 Everton 27771 5 Tottenham Hotspur 25921 6 Newcastle United 21059 7 Chelsea 20118 8 West Ham United 19802 9 Sheffield Wednesday 19797 10 Nottingham Forest...

Our support was much higher than that in the late '90's. I'm afraid this "we were never supported well in the premiership" line is up there with "CCFC always had to win on the last day to stay up" in terms of mythology. Average CCFC attendances in the late 90's: 1995/96 18,907 1996/97 19,625...

Yep, all those clubs were in the exact same position as us.