Search results

I decided to watch Red Eye. Utterly ridiculous and daft as a brush. Quite entertaining though.

Whatever it is, it needs a complete reform and rethink. I think scrapping it entirely would be the wrong move. If someone elbows a player in the face, off the ball and the refs don't see it, surely it's a good thing for an eye in the sky to relay that to the ref, that there's been a serious...

As inept as Norwich were, I have to say I was very impressed with Leeds last night.

Where are they streaming? I will give them a look.

It is bad now for sure. If will be tenfold though if they now scrap VAR. Everything all back on the ref. That's not a pro VAR stance, it's just the reality, sadly.

If I remember rightly, I was so excited I got to Wembley at 10.30, believing there would be a real buzz going on, but I think we were just about the only people there. It was absolutely deserted and we just sat about for hours.🤷

1. Obviously Scrapping it I feel would be a disaster now. The increased pressure on refs would be completely off the scale.

Unfortunately it's not Wingy. It will be how the clubs feel, not the fans and it will be a decision based on money. One wrong decision can have huge financial consequences. Really hope that if it's to be kept, it can be used properly. Should be goal line technology plus the likes of serious...

I am watching it too. Problem for me is, it's very derivative and so soon after Constellation, it's a bit like an extension of that. Also, even though I do think he is a very good actor, I think Joel Edgerton is completely miscast in this. Just can't sympathise with or associate with, or root...

Same. Only trouble is I was in my 20's at the time.

The least he could have done was go go in armed with a spray can of sky blue paint.

"The Premier League believes removing VAR would increase the number of incorrect decisions and potentially leave the on-field officials open to even greater criticism than they currently receive. The Premier League’s figures show the number of correct decisions in matches has increased from 82%...

Think I would rather pay the money and get some cinnamon buns sent to him from a bakery, before every home game, so I could shout out "Viveash, Viveash, give us a swirl."

A few things really, but seems a lot of the equipment was inadequate and staff had complained about it and only having one vent for 5 babies etc. That she wasn't actually present at every death, as the prosecution implied. I am not saying she is innocent, or there should be a retrial, I am just...

It seems very detailed, so yes. Just needs someone professional to look at it really doesn't it. It's not asking a lot. Someone like Inside Justice. Just for someone to give it a read and see if it warrants further scrutiny.

Gobbins? A bit rude, innit.

Yes. Same here. But the British justice system does worry me at times. Just think it's worth someone going over this with a fine toothed comb.

I certainly don't think there is any harm at all in going over the case. Be nice to know that justice was indeed served.

I was absolutely fine about it to be honest, because I am more than happy to let the one with the extra B go. That way we get to keep the real one.

It at least needs looking at again. Maybe someone like Inside Justice