Search results

No I can't prove that. I can say why I think its highly unlikely that it will happen though.

I don't need to as no one has claimed he has. The CET said SP would start legal proceedings if he didn't receive his pay out. For one reason or another you have a bee in your bonnet about this and are now claiming its rubbish. You are the one trying to disprove a story put out by the CET...

Can anyone on here prove that SP hasn't started legal proceedings?

Unfortunately that approach has manifested itself into many fans heads that 30 odd years at the bottom of Div 1/Prem was good. The fact we never moved the club on to the next level is unacceptable.

Would you prefer it if we only discussed issues that were pre-approved by you?

I love a good conspiracy theory, although this is one of the best yet. So now the Telegraph is anti CCFC? Poor old Sisu, everyone's against them aren't they?

Also one of the few in recent years to have the decency to resign. All the others held out to get their contractual payout.

This is pretty concerning, we're not very good at beating other bottom half teams: http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/league-one/2014-2015/versus-bottom-half

Looking at how its going to pan out, we need two wins and a draw from our final 6 games to stay up.

Would we not be better with Crewe winning? Would make it much more difficult for Crawley to beat us.

More should be made of the Golden Cross. Its one of the oldest continuous pubs in the country.

Yes of course, once in the Championship. As there our competitors would have access to income streams that we currently have not. In this division, under our current deal, we should be more than capable of getting promotion (or at least competing for it). Right now the main problem suppressing...

There's no guarantee of promotion from receiving all stadium incomes. How many times did we challenge for promotion between 2001 & 2005?

In a strange sort of way it might be better if Notts County win today. They haven't won for 5 games, lose today and that will be 6. Now we all know what happens when city come up against a team that haven't won for 6 games don't we?

Let me put it another way then, something along the lines that the OP is talking about would cost far less to construct than a new stadium in Rugby.

Well the club managed perfectly well for 80 odd years prior to HR ownership being moved to a subsidiary. Within 8 years of separating the ground and "the club" we had no stadium and were £60m in debt.

It has a better chance of working than the alternative. I.e building a football stadium so you can host a wedding fair. Its never been explained how the new stadium debt would be paid off.

But who are you to say that someone should lose weight? What if they don't want to? Does that make them fair game for abuse? The message here seems to be "unless you fit into our idea of the perfect human specimen, then prepare for ridicule and abuse". So your obviously against abuse...

Just like racial slurs its a form of bullying, and anyone that's seen bullying first hand knows the damage that can be done to someone's self confidence. Unfortunately not all forms of bullying are treated equally.

I imagine most people would agree. Many people find it upsetting when they become the target of abuse.