Search results

Ha ha yes, I would say probably bollocks then but if others are saying the same then could be something in it.

Did you see that twat saying AFTV made Arsenal relevant?

Can play 10 as well as wide. Talented boy, good dribbler. I could see some truth in this if Leeds are willing to let him go.

£7m+ & then add ons on top.

That 13.5k will include the 30% he says didn't turn up too wouldn't it? So actually more like 9,500 in the ground, some of which were only paying £10? Christmas Cracker indeed, they'll be giving the tickets away in them next year.

Was released, he's a free agent.

Brandon Mason on trial with Reading

He'll go to a decent European side, almost certainly Feyenoord I'd imagine. Deal was agreed in the summer but he got injured then.

He doesn't foul him?

It shows the contract as Odegaard on Ederson rather than the other way around?

Interesting. From that there's no touch on the ball by Ederson but no foul either so still the correct decision.

Listen, I hate VAR more than anyone but... The Odegaard one I still think Ederson gets a piece of the ball, at worst it's 50/50 so shouldn't be overturned - Correct decision. Silva one - he's fouled twice, the trip & the shirt pull - Correct decision

Rodri finally booked 🤣

Yep, apparently jury were allowed to see extracts but not all of it & they're not going to investigate it further. Disgusting.

It doesn't. Signed a 2 month contract on 18th November.

Arsenal absolutely self destructing. They'd been brilliant first half. No point blaming the officials, every decision has been correct.

"32-yr-old's short-term deal expires today" 100% factually incorrect. The piece is by some no mark journo called Wayne Vesey, struggling to find anything at all that he's ever called correctly tbh.

It's utter nonsense clickbait. His deal doesn't expire today & he's already in talks about extending it anyway. Pure horseshit from one of the least credible accounts around (and that's saying something).

I see, so completely pointless then.