Search results

Yes but I will say it again I never said anything about blame in my post. You did in your reply.

How did he do in the division we were in when he was allowed to go for free. When we had no striker for the second half of the season. 17 goals. He should have been loaned out. Never released for free.

Sorry Nick just re read your post Thought you were saying the council would still pay up. You are talking about whose fault it is. Yes it would still be down to the council if the judges decide that way. That's not really relevant to my post though. But yes I agree with you

I didn't say anything about blame. I said if the money is to be paid out by the council I would prefer the council to win. Especially if it affects the people of Coventry. If it's to be paid out by central Government then I may change my opinion on that. Blame wise I have always said both...

If they Government are liable I assume they will pay. Otherwise what's the point of involving them. If it comes out the council's budget I don't want SISU to win as that directly affects the people of Coventry. If the Government pay up then that's the central pot.

Ah that's sweet Nick to the rescue

Not sure how I feel about this now. If knew for certain the government would be paying damages. It may change my perspective. They have taken a lot of my money over the last few years. So may not bother me as much. If it gets SISU's investors their money back and allows SISU to sell up. Or...

Remember reading that his contract had been cancelled. Thought to myself he is coming out way Thought MAF would be moved on first though we are having a big squad for the first time in about 6 years

Ha ha that tells me all I need to know SP didn't rate Cody and Baker SP and Grendal have the same football knowledge = zero

How that was never a referendum is outrageous!!! Coventry ad the main city of warwickshire for me every time. Labour government not getting bed with conservatives was the issue there. Very wrong

No question especially if rumours of 50-100 million are true

The Lord himself said any damages would likely come from the government. (Well not the 'Lord') a Lord

Someone in the running of the club told me getting rid of Baker was a purely footballing decision by SP. I couldn't get my head around it, it had to be financial or personality. If it was a footballing decision then it was an insane one as his performances for MK find in this division and...

I assume the judgement can be quashed. If it was going to cost you a fortune and a judge said he is surprised you are not there to be represented. Then he gets told you haven't been told anything about it. Then as oppose to adjourning it he just cracks on. If they do decide in SISU's favour...

Surely you must agree they left in order to break the contract and apply more pressure?

Did anyone see the Government getting dragged into it coming..... Still say if the judge decides in SISU's favour and asks the Government to Cov up millions. They will appeal it on the grounds the judge asked why they were not represented in one of his first questions. Then carried on...

Pretty sure they are lords matey But the judge kind not parliament kind

I wouldn't want to make that phone call!!! You would have thought when the Lords got the heads up about this case, they should have asked straight away where is the QC for the government. I would imagine if they are to be held accountable if the decision is in SISU's favour that they may ask...

I can the impression SISU's case depends a bit more on personalities and an agenda by the council The council's case seems to be based on boring legal facts. I assume that the boring legal facts if they are correct will probably win the day?

I knew someone else was behind this