Search results

I find that bizzare . I could understand if they said he did fail to declare but it was unintentional so it's not a breach of the code. Or he failed to declare because he misunderstood the rules and was not intentionally holding anything back. So it is ok. But if they are saying he...

Who claimed it never happened? He admitted it and explained why? Mr Goacher says his answer is reasonable as that what other councils accept but Coventry rules are different. Are they saying he broke the rule but unintentionally and the rule is different in different councils so he hasn't...

Common sense really take your council SISU ACL wasps whatever hat off. Do you want to live in a society where a councillor can express an opinion such as he thinks a person or company are driven by greed. Or Do you want every answer you ever hear from A councillor to be bland and...

Right and they have ignored it because of what other councils do. Then they should either change the codes to match other councils. Or if they are keeping then the sane then yes slap on the wrist. Sounds like a reasonable explanation.

Did he find stuff I his report then and say yes this is a breach?

Without naming names but in this hypothetical situation do you really think an independent lawyer, asked to determine if An Ex leader and current leader of a public body had broke some codes of ethics. Would have firstly been chosen in order to give the right result and gave the right result...

Sewn up

Are they exempt from the codes of ethics then? That was just a quick load I am sure council leaders have criticised private companies as well.

Ha ha you need someone independent to write a report about it first though

Now that breaks the SBT codes of ethics.

I think it depends on your interpretation of the codes of ethics. It think they should have just said stating that a company are driven by greed was his opinion. He was not rude or disrespectful. It was his opinion. SISU should have said show me a company that is not a charity that isn't...

I didn't find it too offensive if you make a stand on someone referring to someone else as driven by greed. Do we not get to the point where we never here people's points of views instead we will just get Prepared, bland, boring safe statements never expressing an opinion Just a quick Google...

I may not have read into the declaring interests one, properly to be honest. Didn't the outcome find he had stopped declaring after he had no financial interest which looking at the way other councils do it, that is the right thing to do?

Good point

I think you are ignoring my 3rd/4th line about it not been massively rude or disrespectful. Do you think the comment is genuinely damaging, offensive and upsetting to SISU?

Mr Fisher was quoted in a national newspaper as saying: “They (ACL) need to re-enter negotiations pronto or we file. We’ll have no option because there would not be reasonable probability of avoiding insolvency liquidation.”

I think I have answered that one as you were typing. What is your answer to my question?

I presume it's not breaking the code of ethics as he is agreeing with what has already been said. It's not massively rude or disrespectful. He could have said it in a more professional way such as he believes SISU are driven solely by profits and nothing else. That he needs to see that they can...

To be honest with you if I invested my money in a hedge fund I would want them to fit that description. However I am sure it wasn't meant as a compliment. I guess that where the different responsibilities lay. If a charity and a council run a community asset they have their feet in both...

The timings don't look good for Mr Anderson. It has still never been explained why Mr Waggott left. However it seems everybody who meets Mr Anderson speaks positively about him. He actually hasn't come out and said anything too ridiculous So on that basis you have to give him a chance