Search results

The Thunderbirds Producer? That's him. What do you think then Otis what does the future hold?

Excellent contribution as always, very valued

Chris Andersons brother !!! Thanks

CA said in the Telegraph there are no thoughts from SISU regarding moving on. I don't know what the long term strategy is. Here are a few gueses. Which do you think is likely? Are there any missing? Build a new stadium and either sell the whole package I would guess still at a loss...

I appreciate this is hypothetical, however if they were to accept a price of 24 million. If they had managed to do the wasps deal. Then would someone have had to paid them 30 million and take in a 14 million loan in order to buy them out?

Best clarify, who has got the job isn't what really wound me up. It is the fact that decision to join greater Birmingham affects every citizen of Coventry yet we didn't get a referendum!!!

Got to feel for you

I won't argue with you on this one. It was an absolute disgrace not to have a referendum on this.

Too right, which is what I said at the beginning they have just badly explained their decision. Or not really explained it at all to be fair.

Not relevant on this thread but this is something that has really pissed off about the Council. I would have preferred if Les Reid for example spent his time digging into why the people of Coventry, were not allowed to vote on whether we become part of Greater Birmingham or Greater...

You must agree that there are rules where it is black and white and you don't get an opportunity to explain. Then there are others where the whole circumstances are looked at and it is taken into consideration. I would say codes of ethics get looked at within the context of the whole...

Nothing is ever black and white with something like that it would be impossible.

You remind me of a symbiotic relationship. Where lions allow the birds to pick insects of their backs. Only CL football was it now, surely I said they would win the Win the Club World Cup?

There certainly are So are the codes of ethics for councils treated in the same manor as tax evasion? A man states he didn't declare as he didn't think he had to as he had no financial interest anymore. He was declaring up until that point. In other councils you don't declare if you have...

What have I made up?

Well that's it then welcome to the world according to Zack, where we will never get hear a Council Leaders opinion on something. Dont ever unintentionally break the rules. There are no grey areas. You break You break those rules whatever the circumstances = guilty

I think you are to be fair. loads of people do things that break the rules unintentionally all the time and are therefore not guilty of it. You would never make it as Judge Judy or Rinder.

What if he did it but isn't guilty of it. Like picking up a packet of crisps because there is a free sign over it. However if you read it properly the free sign was for a different pack. You walk out without paying. You break the rules but not intentionally therefore you are not guilty. You...

He is innocent really. For something like that surely it would have to be intentional? You can see why they are flippant about it because Mr Goacher has called it a 'technical' breach. He goes on to say elsewhere it wouldn't be an issue. They should have addressed though in the findings...

Yep can see your issue and Dave's with that. It just seems to be badly concluded. I wouldn't Jump from that to then saying you can't trust the whole process? I couldn't even see him getting a slap on the wrist for that. They should have said he hasn't intentionally not declared. It was human...