Search results

Exactly, so It can only be an issue for Wasps if the council are found to be in the wrong, something we have been repeatedly told isn't the case. That would mean the taxpayer has been deprived of tens of millions. Should that be the case why would anyone take issue with Wasps being ordered to...

Maybe you can tell me how, if CCC have done no wrong as we have repeatedly been told, any complaint to the EC about the council is going to have consequences for Wasps? The point you seem to keep missing is it can only impact Wasps if CCC are found to be in the wrong. If that is the case surely...

What does it tie up? Its for the EC to decide if they will investigate CCC. It has nothing to do with Wasps. If they decide an investigation should proceed it will be against CCC not Wasps and any defence and associated costs will be the councils. Why would Wasps need to set aside for a risk...

Presume Sky have already informed the relevant authorities which games they will be moving for TV.

If, as we have repeatedly been assured, the council did not wrong then there will be no consequence to Wasps, will not involve Wasps, and is a total irrelevance to Wasps. Its simple, Wasps put a condition in place. The club and SISU met that condition. The condition was changed.

The complaint to the EC was about a third party not Wasps. It didn't fall within the requirements Wasps had put in place which the club met prior to Wasps changing the terms. Presumably if there was a requirement for everyone to be upfront about things involving third parties Wasps informed the...

Don’t think we got a lot of it back. Seem to recall the council citing a time limit on claiming a refund and only paying back the last two or three years.

The redaction is odd. For example Fishers name is redacted but Sepallas isn’t.

It’s just so obvious now. Nobody can possibly be so stupid they can’t see that the football club, or OEG if you want to call it that, and SISU are separate entities. Same people will be arguing CCC had nothing to do with the PR, that was all ACL.

Rob Dorsett (@RobDorsettSky) | Twitter - chap who did the interview Dan Donovan (@danieldonovan) | Twitter - producer

It's pretty well hidden on the council site but you can get to it here: Agenda item - Hearing into Complaint under Code of Conduct - Coventry City Council Appendix 5B is the one with the emails.

If you look at the emails in the council ethics report they take about going after Sepalla and SISU, even talking about doorstepping her. Webber Shandwick copy in council email addresses, why would they do that if the council had no involvement?

This is where the council don't do themselves any favours. We've all seen the emails about a media war and doorstepping but they make out there's nothing to it. They would look far better if they addressed what actually happened rather than giving it 'nothing to see here' and hoping nobody checks.

I don't see any issue with speaking to the likes of the Telegraph and CWR. If nothing else it could encourage people who could make use of the tickets to get in contact. If you don't want to do it maybe someone else can go on and speak?

Maybe they should speak to each other before firing out statement as Hoffman has now said he was talking with Wasps about a long term deal at the Ricoh! Suspect Wasps are playing with semantics. I don't think anyone believes Wasps as a company or Richardson as an individual are going to put...

Still refusing to confirm or deny if Wasps are involved but has admitted he has had talks with them in the CT, although they've done their best to bury it in the article.

By ‘dealt with’ do they mean emails were produced which showed they were doing exactly what Seppala has claimed?

There's a couple of clips here: Coventry City (Sky Sports) They might add more later. The reporter tweeted that as there's been so much interest they might try and post the whole interview online.

Les Reid Exclusive INterview with Seppalla....

Nothing earth shattering even in the extended clip, hopefully Sky make the whole interview available. Does seem to have prompted Gilbert into action on some of the issues we've wanted digging in to for a while, hopefully he continues down that road and doesn't just accept whatever waffle the...