Search results

Because I never said anything about morals and bribes You did. I think they took the tough path as oppose to the easy one.

Yes I am sure all this legal action, JUdicial Reviews, Ethical Hearings. The Secretary of State, the football club moving to Northampton. Having to do deals with Wasps. The Ricoh empty Was all standard day to day business as usual!!

I think it was SISU claiming that in the appeal However the appeal judges who heard that allegation from SISU, which I think I recall was a key party of their aopeal ruled in favour of the original judgement. So they didn't agree with it. So no blindness

Of course it would Look at what's happening now and everything that has happened over the last 4-5 years

Not sure about driving it up I think they just stood up to SISU when it looked like the value was was potentially going to be driven down to nothing. Leaving a charity and the council with nothing

Or I just think they choose the tough path and stood up for themselves, when it would have been less painful to let SISU bully them into submission. I haven't said anything about bribes morals ect.

would have been a lot easier to let SISU get their way

What did the original 2014 High Court judgment say? Among the judge’s key findings was that the crisis at ACL had been triggered by Sisu refusing to pay rent £1.3m annual rent. He added the withdrawal of rent was a deliberate strategy by Sisu to “distress ACL’s financial position, with a view to...

Hurts me to say it but Grendel is right What is more important than debating the future of the club you love.

You didn't someone else did on this thread and it's bull shit. Can you let me know what we should be doing regarding Wasps and the Council?

I was impressed that the council stood up for itself when SISU were as the high court judge stated trying to drive the value of ACL down. It took a lot of balls for the council not to be be bullied and when the council stood up for itself. That's when asISU should have realised they had pushed...

I would suggest such people don't really exist or if there is the odd one. Are they really a point worth raising?

I don't take the view the club is getting what it deserves the club has not done anything. The owners are reaping what they sow. I take no pleasure in that because it screws my club over massively. However I am not shocked, horrified and stunned that it is happening. I know why it is happening...

So we can do nothing about SISU. However we can make life difficult for the Council and Wasps? So what should we be doing to the Council and Wasps? It's just bullshit to suggest that people who a portion the majority of the blame on our owners don't go to matches or are not fans. I don't read...

Yes they can't be football fans If you support the team You must blindly defend the owners when they make decisions that slowly destroy the club SISU are CCFC So I will bring my half SISU half CCFC scarf to the next game

Yes pretty sure most fan feels like that whatever their opinions on this sorry saga

Yes if you disagree with the decisions our owners have made. That are now having devistating repercussions on our club. You must really hate watching football

People don't think it's ok. They just have enough brain capacity to understand why it is happening and who carries the loin's share of the blame. The fact SISU own the football doesn't mean that you blindly defend every decision they make, especially when the repercussions of those decisions...

End of the day like with Ricoh. It's quite simply a case of the boy who cried wolf. When you are threatening to go elsewhere. If your landlord gets a more permanent solution Then you try and change your stance Unfortunately you can only have yourself to blame

The whole situation summed up perfectly