Search results

Or an alternative logic. We have a top 8 budget before we sell a player for 2-3 million. We are told the 2-3 million is going back into the club. We release a load of players freeing up lots of wages from that already boosted budget and we only sign 3-4 players. Yet we still have to make the...

Maybe Its a case of not breaking the wage structure if its true vincelot was offered double your money. We know sisu aren't going to fund a promotion push unfortunately. That's the bit that gets me. SISU don't get what they have in TM. To have him plying his trade for us at this level. It...

Sorry. Still reads the same way to me but if you're saying that's not what it means then fair enough. What I am saying is. In reality TM should be able to keep one of his best players and still make the signings he wants. Less than 100k is not a massive transfer fee. If TM was given the...

No question we will sign a big centre half but when fit stokes will be part of the back three

Just shows how clueless you are Reid would play as part of an attacking three. McCann is the one who would replace Haynes. Time to finally accept Stokes is a CB not a LB?

Mowbray wouldn't have even had Vincelot in his starting midfield now let alone by the time we get to the start of the season you clueless oaf. Yep, probably wouldn't have even had him in the squad.:p

Kyle Reid is a good tricky wide left player had two spells with us. On a good day a match winner on bad will fluff final delivery (Bradford fan I know)

Great....

Try not to let him take you off track folks. Just post your questions for Jan and ignore the diversions We finally need some answers

Jan sorry for the overload but I am sure you can summarise what I am saying Once again thanks for your efforts

Budget Since last year it seems we have released more players than we have signed. So I would expect us to have a surplus in comparison to last years budget at this stage. When Maddison was sold you intimated that the money would used over future seasons. If the club has put the same money...

Always expected him to play in the left of a back three. More naturally he position. He is a better CB than a marauding full back who can't maraude

You're saying that TM is wrong to state it is his call, if you're not accusing him of lying you're accusing him of not knowing what he's on about. Keep reading and stop twisting. 3rd go you might conclude that what I am saying is actually what I said. Stop been a poor mans Grendel

Have a read again, but actually read it this time.

Personally gutted at the sale of Vincelot. However TM said it was his call. It's actually not, TM's call would be keep Vince and sign the players he wants. However our owner hasn't bullshitted. She said the club will pay for itself. That's why TM must choose. He has made his choice. I would...

One of two things is happening here in my opinion. They either really don't understand the science of negotiating when you are not in the position of strength. That is when you are asking someone for help who dont have to give you anything, if they don't want to. When you demand and state this...

Simple fact is fans tried to get the three parties who can give the academy s future together. One didn't turn up. Now unless they all knew before that CA would except then pull out last minute. It's a bit far fetched to say it was planned PR that the trust are in on. Simple fact is it gives...

Oh that it's already agreed. I always got the impression Wasps and CSF were going to suggest a solution that would probably statisfy the FA. However the club never turned up to find out what it was.

Doesn't the above say the academy would still exist. Sorry all of that was a bit confusing to me.

Sorry you mean the temporary changes whilst they build. No that's just standard business nothing special. Luckily they don't follow the mantra "contracts are there to be broken". If they did business like some were encouraging our owners to do in the past, we would be royally in it.