Search results

Good news !! They should approach Cov Uni as well. Have the approached Wasps yet to get talks started there as well?

Not naive in the slightest. You are just joining the dots and deciding you don't believe their explanation and this statement. I am inclined to agree with you, our opinion counts for didly squat. The facts do. Neither of us know for a fact if the council are telling the truth or lying...

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/council-wont-put-obstacles-way-11364578

Also in black and white http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/council-wont-put-obstacles-way-11364578

Not questioning the legality of it. Just that they will deal with the facts not supposition. The council did not not block the butts deal or any other deal as there never has been any deal to be blocked on any location. The FL will be far more demanding in requiring proof of both the clubs...

Separately though I also wonder for SISU what is the point? If it's not local, like with Northampton it will be a disaster again with 1000-2000 fans at the most. Unless I really don't understand things which I probably don't. It's seems to me that SISU's only hope of getting money now is the...

The most derailing person of any given thread I have ever seen. It usually follows him losing the debate so he just shifts into something he is bit more comfortable with.

Does anyone follow Les Reid on Twitter and if so, would you mind asking if he could ask his contacts at the club if they have arranged these talks yet?

He played for them in Europe

I am merely saying what the FL have to deal with

Yes he has a vested interest in promoting Rugby

Did the council block SISU, no Have they explained what they were doing, yes Did the lease holder actually block them, yes You can believe them or not unfortunately you cannot actually disprove their explanation and they also said they wouldn't try and block any deal between SISU and the Butts...

Yes but that didn't actually stop the football club going to the Butts. The lease holder did. Don't get me wrong it seems the council were trying to block it, but they said it was a judgement in error and was trying to see if the butts were in negotiations as oppose to a genuine attempt to...

I know what you are saying but they will need to deal with facts

Problem is it doesn't hold up. The council said they would look at planning permission like any other planning job. The owner of lease said no to CCFC coming. I appreciate you can read behind the lines but the council have not blocked the butts. We all take it for granted they have but...

Ah right so they stayed in Brighton for the ten years whilst their ground was built. Nothing like our Northampton scenario

Council - should be sod all to do with them at this stage. Other than planning permission. They should if they can help the football club in anyway they can, if they are not getting sued by the football club. However I understand them taking a step back and not getting involved with the club...

So the FL let them leave Brighton for ten years, whilst their new stadium was built?

Unlike you I can think the council did the right thing in one area and criticise them in others.

That didn't answer my question