Search results

Great start, now lets get this wrapped up by half time.

Is ifollow further behind than usual or are we kicking off late?

Don't think there's been any mention of the statement on CWR or in the Telegraph, let alone any national coverage. Sadly it looks like its been done just so they can say they have done it.

Remember we are in a transition period and don't actually leave until 1 January 2021. By then I would expect the EC to have decided if they wish to proceed or not. If they do then, in line with the UK's stated position below, it would remain with the CJEU.

Playing the likes of Golcar United, Cleator Moor Celtic, Atherton Laburnum Rovers and Holker Old Boys. They won't actually be playing in Bury either, they're planning to groundshare with Radcliffe Borough. Unbelievable that this was some people's preferred option for us.

That would only happen if we crash out with no deal and no intention of making a deal in the future. Any other scenario will mean the relevant EU laws and regulations at the time still apply.

Looks like it was sold out again

What a joke of a league. They've completely botched dealing with Saracens and done who knows how much damage to the league brand. Still think there's a twist to come. Can't see Saracens just sitting back and taking these defeats week in week out playing under strength teams.

I'd probably be done with football, certainly wouldn't switch to another team. I'm increasingly disinterested in England games and the Premier League is rapidly losing its appeal as a spectacle. Just the same few teams going for the title every year unless someone comes in and spends a fortune...

Can you prove your bullshit theory or just more mud slinging? :joyful:

They can't, but then they can't justify it now as they are still trying to get one company, Otium, to provide indemnity on an EC complaint made by someone else, SISU, against a third party, CCC. So logically if a change of ownership would mean the indemnity falls away there is no reason for it...

They want the club to cover the idemnity not SISU. And a change of owners doesn't stop any potential EC investigation.

If we changed owners the issue of indemification would still exist which would rule out a return to Cov. Is getting new owners more important to you than getting back to Cov?

They've also been out doing promotion in local pubs trying to shift tickets at a fiver a go with very little uptake.

Could someone on here who lives in a country still in the EU ask their MEP to chase it up?

WTF? There was only a handful of people there, why was there a need for any security at all!?!

It expired ages ago but they did a deal where Ricoh pay a nominal amount to continue as Wasps didn't want to pay to take all the signage down. Suspect they thought it would be a short term thing but even after Wasps engaged specialists to sell the naming rights still doesn't seem to be any...

Why did the lease need to be broken for CCC to move Wasps in?