Search results

to me it would need an almost immediate investment (substancial) from someone who didn't mind losing money in the short/medium term. My hunch is that Hoffmans consortium would not have been to disimilar to SISU. Can't see that they would have been happy to chuck money at it with no return.

Scenario is (unlikely) they just get fed up with it take the hit and go

for an ignoramus like myself can someone paint a picture of the next few days, months after SISU left if they did so tomorrow. How would it work? Who would pay players? Organise matchdays etc. No axe to grind just interests me really want some opinions ideas so starting fresh post...

Yes I know, it was a piece of dazzling humour. Different seasons though sadly. ] Expected that result. Unfortunately you have to take your chances when you can (Reading, Blackpool) because a bad performance is always around the corner

point slightly missed. I too see absolutely no point in making a change. I am saying that because a large amount of people are blaming SISU for everything that happens them AT does not seem responsible in anyway for anything. He could switch to 1-2-7 at 1-0 up with 2 minutes to go and it would...

possibly but I've heard it said enough times. I guess what I'm saying is if we are never going to blame the manager for anything then whats the point in having one!

my question is this. A lot of posters have said that we are only 1 or 2 players from being a mid table side. It follows that we must have some decent players already. Therefore surely with the position we are in we are underforming and so the manager must be culpable to a certain degree

honest and brave post. I think if we had owners that we were happy with and they appointed Thorn we would be asking serious questions. Nothing whatsoever against Thorn the man. However he is in a position where there is so much distraction with the animosity towards SISU that he is seemingly...

for an ignoramus like myself can someone paint a picture of the next few days, months after SISU left if they did so tomorrow. How would it work? Who would pay players? Organise matchdays etc. No axe to grind just interests me

Forget the ownership issues and ask whether AT is getting the most out of that team. I'm not sure he is. However it is early days still

9 from 11? Have i missed something?

3 oclock on a Tuesday ain't that convenient for most people though is it with work

I thought it was quite a good reposte to people arrogantly disrespecting Barnsley

there is a lot to blame SISU for but I also think that this team playing at its potential is not a bottom 3 side. They need to shoulder the blame too

why complicate things? :D

because he was a twat?

reoccupy HR

yeh its better but it stops getting entertaining the moment we cross the halfway line. nearly 15 years? I preferred 1998 1999 and 2000 myself :D

didn't help, try harder :D

so they cover the losses for years just to grab half a million here and there from some young players, don't stack up to me