Search results

"may then become"

If they win, it may then become certain we don't get to play at the Ricoh any more. I prefer justice to prevail....but, I would be torn if it then meant the end of our club.

Where is all this happening nick?

It's Brendan then...

Burge was OK in the checkatrade final, we won He was OK last season, 14 clean sheets, and we got promoted. He has been OK this season and we are higher up the league than many would have expected. Hardly hapless. We would all like a top class keeper here, but you have to be realistic about who...

If the strikers were on form, we wouldn't be worrying about Burge.

So, you would have sacked oggy after one season then? change that to "after every season". He's a club legend, but bloody hell he used to drop some clangers, regularly. Whenever someone posts an old match up on you tube, there will be a clip of oggy mucking something up, dropping a cross...

That'll be half the people on here...but..which half??

That's complete bollocks. You're using the standard line someone comes out with when they haven't got an answer. Seen it before on here. You say you have been constructive, have lots of ideas, while also spending lots of time berating the trust and what they do, so why not put yourself up to go...

WTF Nick. Have you read your on posts on this thread? Do YOU know the difference?

And I also see how, as usual, you cant let them go without insults or trying to belittle people. You were all over the Johnson article, when in reality, most of it was factual. You kept going on and on about him not going to the games, and that his reasoning doesn't exist, f*** all to do with...

Well that's bollocks for a start. That would suggest there's more than one each page.... :emoji_smiley: Now, if you were talking insulting and condescending comments... then there'd be well over that, and that's just from you..!!

No good m8, it appears they have enough of those. If only you were a rabid council hater.. :emoji_joy:

It seems to me that we have a few candidates on here who should stand for election onto the trust board.

Yes ;)

That may be so. However, it doesn't make his article wrong in this particular case. Most of it is Gilbert rehashed, and you could get nearly all of it off the threads in here anyway I would guess.

That hasn't narrowed it down much...

What effect do you think "myth busting" would have on the "lack of thinking" brigade? Any?

I was referring to this thread, and the article written. There's nothing in it that would make me "more" anti SISU. It's stuff we all know, and I suspect nearly all of it true. Whatever has been left out, and for whatever reason, it will not have any effect on me, and I suspect most everyone...

Whatever they're pushing, most on here, won't be buying, unless they are already of a similar mind. The thing is, whatever is being pushed will not have the slightest effect on SISU, Wasps or the Council. In all the things that's gone on, what, if any, effect has it had in moving things forward?